RE: temp directories

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Dubois
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > # from David Golden on Thursday 15 January 2009 21:07: > > > That's probably not quite enough -- I think it means being a bit > > smarter about temp directories and files, as the M::B tests tend to > > re-use a directory over and over again. (They also see

Re: win32 unlink()

2009-01-16 Thread Adam Kennedy
Personally, I don't mind at all. All Strawberry installs since the October release support configure_requires out of the box and are configured to always prefer Build.PL (pretty sure on that last one, but I'll double check it for the January release). Adam K 2009/1/16 Eric Wilhelm : > So, I'm in

Re: win32 unlink()

2009-01-16 Thread Curtis Jewell
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:25:55 +1100, "Adam Kennedy" said: > Personally, I don't mind at all. > > All Strawberry installs since the October release support > configure_requires out of the box and are configured to always prefer > Build.PL (pretty sure on that last one, but I'll double check it for

Re: temp directories

2009-01-16 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > And should we should instead be using File::Temp's tempdir anyway? > It adds a build_requires dependency and it was only core as of 5.6.1. Personally, I don't mind adding it, but it shouldn't be done lightly. -- David

Re: temp directories

2009-01-16 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:14:51AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Eric Wilhelm > wrote: > > > And should we should instead be using File::Temp's tempdir anyway? > > > > It adds a build_requires dependency and it was only core as of 5.6.1. --- name: Module-Build ve