Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE

2010-02-22 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:26:51 -0800, Michael G Schwern > said: > Adam Kennedy wrote: >> You should not add MYMETA.yml to the MANIFEST, it will NEVER ship to CPAN. >> >> Remove the signature test. > ...because its redundant, complicates testing, has little security > value and

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP

2010-02-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
Eric Wilhelm wrote: # from David Golden # on Monday 22 February 2010 20:26: But I'm curious about how the automatic addition of MYMETA.yml to MANIFEST.SKIP (as shown in the output) didn't keep you from running into this. (I'm mostly concerned about whether it might cause problems for more vali

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP

2010-02-22 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from David Golden # on Monday 22 February 2010 20:26: >>> But I'm curious about how the automatic addition of MYMETA.yml to >>> MANIFEST.SKIP (as shown in the output) didn't keep you from running >>> into this.  (I'm mostly concerned about whether it might cause >>> problems for more valid use-c

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP

2010-02-22 Thread David Golden
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Eric Wilhelm wrote: >>> >>> $master:~/cpan/perlids>./Build disttest >>> Creating Makefile.PL >>> Creating META.yml >>> *File 'MANIFEST.SKIP' does not include 'MYMETA.yml'. Adding it now.* >>> ... >>> *t/00-signature.t . Not in MANIFE

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP

2010-02-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
Eric Wilhelm wrote: $master:~/cpan/perlids>./Build disttest Creating Makefile.PL Creating META.yml *File 'MANIFEST.SKIP' does not include 'MYMETA.yml'. Adding it now.* ... *t/00-signature.t . Not in MANIFEST: MYMETA.yml ==> MISMATCHED content between MANIFEST and distribution files! <==* I

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. MANIFEST.SKIP

2010-02-22 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Hinnerk Altenburg # on Monday 22 February 2010 06:29: > $master:~/cpan/perlids>./Build disttest > Creating Makefile.PL > Creating META.yml > *File 'MANIFEST.SKIP' does not include 'MYMETA.yml'. Adding it now.* >... > *t/00-signature.t . Not in MANIFEST: MYMETA.yml > ==> MISMATCHED conte

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE

2010-02-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
Adam Kennedy wrote: You should not add MYMETA.yml to the MANIFEST, it will NEVER ship to CPAN. Remove the signature test. ...because its redundant, complicates testing, has little security value and provides a false sense of security. If a 3rd party has hijacked the tarball they can simply

Re: MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE

2010-02-22 Thread Adam Kennedy
You should not add MYMETA.yml to the MANIFEST, it will NEVER ship to CPAN. Remove the signature test. Adam K On 23 February 2010 01:29, Hinnerk Altenburg wrote: > Hi, > > I got problems with the MYMETA.yml and the recommended signature test from > http://github.com/audreyt/module-signature/blob

MYMETA.yml vs. SIGNATURE

2010-02-22 Thread Hinnerk Altenburg
Hi, I got problems with the MYMETA.yml and the recommended signature test from http://github.com/audreyt/module-signature/blob/master/t/0-signature.t: $master:~/cpan/perlids>perl ./Build.PL > *Creating new 'MYMETA.yml' with configuration results* > Creating new 'Build' script for 'CGI-IDS' versio