ould already be
present...
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Randy J. RaySunnyvale, CAhttp://www.rjray.org rj...@blackperl.com
Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
After Schwern noticed that search.cpan.org is now using the "repository" key
from META.yml if/when present, I noticed that while both M::B and EU::MM
support the arbitrary data-insertion, it isn't carried over when M::B generates
a Makefile.PL as part of the "Build dist" action.
Should this be
th non-Perl code it seemed
wiser to put them in a more universal location.)
Randy
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Randy J. Ray Sunnyvale, CA http://www.rjray.org rj...@blackperl.com
Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
MSIE.
MS.*
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Randy J. Ray Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
until they see the
output. And it seems odd to put them in the "regular" recommends-key, since
they have no bearing on the module's actual in-the-field functionality.
Randy
--
""""""""""""""""&qu
e, etc.
Randy
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Randy J. Ray Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd of open-ended the issue of actual make-style actions
(that is, sub-processes versus just doing everything within Perl).
Randy
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""&
ell make that X.xpl depends on
X.code, X.help, X.base and the "make_method" script.
What is the accepted "best practice" for doing stuff like this with M::B?
Randy
--
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Randy J. Ray Westminster, COhttp://www.rjray.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
