Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date?

2009-07-06 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Curtis On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 10:58 -0600, Curtis Jewell wrote: > I wonder if he means Test::Prereq (which tests if you've updated your > requirements in the module, but not in your .PL file)? Test::Prereq is indeed the one I was searching for. $many x $thanx; -- Ron Savage r...@savage.net.a

Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date?

2009-07-06 Thread Curtis Jewell
I wonder if he means Test::Prereq (which tests if you've updated your requirements in the module, but not in your .PL file)? --Curtis On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:04 -0700, "Eric Wilhelm" wrote: > # from Ron Savage > # on Sunday 05 July 2009 23:56: > > >The subject says it all. > > up-to-date with r

Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date?

2009-07-06 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Ron Savage # on Sunday 05 July 2009 23:56: >The subject says it all. up-to-date with regard to what? Internally, M::B just uses stat() to check the timestamp of Build vs Build.PL. --Eric -- The only thing that could save UNIX at this late date would be a new $30 shareware version that

[OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date?

2009-07-05 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Folks The subject says it all. -- Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au http://savage.net.au/index.html