2009/1/6 David Golden dagol...@cpan.org:
For what it's worth, this is my first attempt at patching the perl source,
much less sending a patch via git. But I'm very motivated to see M::B stay
current in 5.10.1.
It's also the result of my attempt to fix up add-package.pl -- that patch
coming
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez
rgarciasua...@gmail.com wrote:
That patch steps over the changes below to Build.pm :
commit e5c8c22050be81fb2e880f0c7a2fcbe5496ab5d7
Author: Rafael Garcia-Suarez rgarciasua...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Jan 5 10:47:45 2009 +0100
Bump two
# from David Golden
# on Thursday 08 January 2009 14:21:
I'm open to moving M::B to git (though I've never used git before)
or figuring out some new scheme to make this dual-life stuff easier.
I think it would be GREAT if we moved it to ext/ in blead so that
we didn't have to worry about
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Wilhelm scratchcomput...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm game for whatever VC system, but I'm just the guy in shipping. I
just ship whatever is in trunk|tip|master (or whatever you want to call
it.) At best, I can handle *maybe* one or two bugs from RT per about 3
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Steve Hay steve...@planit.com wrote:
# Okay, this is the brute-force method of finding out what kind of
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ my %OSTYPES = qw(
dynixptx Unix
freebsd Unix
linux Unix
- haiku
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:05:59AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
I think the problem is that porters are patching M::B in blead instead of
in the M::B upstream repository, so as M::B development moves forward, the
two sources drift out of sync. The haiku line does not appear in the
current M::B
2009/1/7 Nicholas Clark n...@ccl4.org:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:05:59AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
I think the problem is that porters are patching M::B in blead instead of
in the M::B upstream repository, so as M::B development moves forward, the
two sources drift out of sync. The haiku
