On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Jan Dubois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it needs to be in 1.4, but it would be good to explicitly
declare the special status of the perl key in the requires section.
The synopsis of the spec indicates that you are supposed to be able to
specify a
On Jun 24, 2008, at 03:42, David Golden wrote:
That's a great point. The Oslo Consensus (from the Oslo QA hackathon)
agreed on supporting 'perl' as a special key for requires,
configure_requires, etc. Having that enshrined in the META.yml spec
would be a great way to ratify that sentiment.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:55 AM, David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 03:42, David Golden wrote:
That's a great point. The Oslo Consensus (from the Oslo QA hackathon)
agreed on supporting 'perl' as a special key for requires,
configure_requires, etc. Having that
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Jan Dubois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qI don't think it needs to be in 1.4, but it would be good to explicitly
declare the special status of the perl key in the requires section.
The synopsis of the spec indicates that you are supposed to be able to
specify a
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:23 PM, David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 23, 2008, at 19:59, Ken Williams wrote:
Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to copy
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-blead.html to
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-v1.4.html .
+1
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release the current meta blead as 1.4? Any rough
edges need polishing?
Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to copy
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-blead.html to
On Jun 23, 2008, at 19:59, Ken Williams wrote:
Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to copy
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-blead.html to
http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-v1.4.html .
+1
David
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Ken Williams wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason not to release the current meta blead as 1.4? Any rough
edges need polishing?
Hearing none, I'll entertain a motion to copy
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:11 PM, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover, could we get a new release of M::B out soon?
configure_requires support is only in 0.2808_01 and there were other
important fixes there that I'd like to see adopted more widely.
OK - let's do the meta release
chorny has patched MakeMaker to add build and configure_requires support, but
realized that the 1.3 META.yml spec doesn't have configure_requires. That's
only in the bleading version. I don't want to release a MakeMaker that
produces blead META.ymls. Can META.yml 1.4 please be released?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chorny has patched MakeMaker to add build and configure_requires support,
but realized that the 1.3 META.yml spec doesn't have configure_requires.
That's only in the bleading version. I don't want to release a
11 matches
Mail list logo
