On 16 Jul 2008, at 04:07, Ken Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Take for example
report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271.
How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere.
Maybe it's some Tes
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:10:20 -0500, "Ken Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Take for example
>>> report http://www
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Take for example
>> report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271.
>
> How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Aut
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Take for example
> report http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/1875271.
How horribly bizarre. We don't even use Devel::Autoflush anywhere.
Maybe it's some Test:: module barfing?
-Ken
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:10:35 -0700, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module-Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz
> As soon as enough people feel confident that nothing has been completely
> broken?
> Any testers want to run a few weeks worth of
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type
publish_module and ship Module::Build.
0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between
whenever the heck it last shipped and now.
At what point would it be prudent to call it a rel
On Jul 10, 2008, at 01:10, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break?
http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module-
Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz
As soon as enough people feel confident that nothing has been
completely
broken?
With this version in
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance we could use a transfer protocol other than e-mail? Was
> there some progress on an HTTP POST mechanism for this?
Yes, actually, that's a good idea.
Test::Reporter::Transport::HTTPGateway -- it was intended to
On Jul 10, 2008, at 01:10, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break?
http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/EW/EWILHELM/Module-
Build-0.2808_02.tar.gz
Those references to 0.2808_03 in API.pm should be changed to 0.2808_02.
Best,
David
# from David Golden
# on Thursday 10 July 2008 04:23:
>That said -- I'm not sure that hitting this list with a couple
>thousand fail reports in a few days is tolerable... :-)
Right. Well our current smoke testing scheme is non-existent, so most
things would be an improvement.
>Maybe we can se
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any testers want to run a few weeks worth of smokes against it? I'm not
> sure if anyone is setup to do that. e.g. for any clean-smoke
> environment - your smoker needs to install the alpha M::B when it sees
> it as requir
# from David E. Wheeler
# on Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:26:
>> At what point would it be prudent to call it a release and kick it
>> out the door?
>
>Tomorrow. ;-P But seriously, who makes this call?
Hmm, who gets to decide when a large portion of CPAN might break?
http://cpan.org/authors/id/E/
MSIE.
MS.*
--
"""
Randy J. Ray Silicon Valley Scale Modelers: http://www.svsm.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 9, 2008, at 17:29, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type
publish_module and ship Module::Build.
0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between
whenever the heck it last shipped and now.
Can we get _03 out now, p
On Jul 9, 2008, at 18:47, Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Eric
Pick the odd one out :-):
Everybody hates:
o Module::Signature
o Development-style version numbers
o Thread implementations which don't work
o XYZ implementations which don't work
o Less than infinitely fast response times
o MS Win2FK
o MS Wi
Hi Eric
Pick the odd one out :-):
Everybody hates:
o Module::Signature
o Development-style version numbers
o Thread implementations which don't work
o XYZ implementations which don't work
o Less than infinitely fast response times
o MS Win2FK
o MS WinXFP
o MS WinFVista
o Etc
--
Ron Savage
[EM
The new file '.perl_developer.yml' in the trunk is to allow me to type
publish_module and ship Module::Build.
0.2808_02 is out now. We should have rolled about 15 alphas between
whenever the heck it last shipped and now.
At what point would it be prudent to call it a release and kick it out
t
17 matches
Mail list logo