Re: Module submission Unicode::Lite

2001-10-09 Thread Kirrily Robert
In perl.modules, you wrote: >On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 02:33:16AM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: >> In perl.modules, you wrote: >> > >> >The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: >> > >> > modid: Unicode::Lite >> >> Why "Lite"? Why not "Light"? Or why not "Simple" w

Re: Module submission Unicode::Lite

2001-10-08 Thread Graham Barr
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 02:33:16AM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: > In perl.modules, you wrote: > > > >The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: > > > > modid: Unicode::Lite > > Why "Lite"? Why not "Light"? Or why not "Simple" which is the usual > suffix for simpl

Re: Module submission Unicode::Lite

2001-10-06 Thread Kirrily Robert
In perl.modules, you wrote: > >The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: > > modid: Unicode::Lite Why "Lite"? Why not "Light"? Or why not "Simple" which is the usual suffix for simplified versions of more complex modules. Not that I know that's what you're doin

Module submission Unicode::Lite

2001-10-06 Thread Albert Micheev
Sending mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Module submission Unicode::Lite The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: modid: Unicode::Lite DSLIP: adpfp description: Library for easy charset convertion

Module submission Unicode::Lite

2001-10-06 Thread Perl Authors Upload Server
The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: modid: Unicode::Lite DSLIP: adpfp description: Library for easy charset convertion userid: AMICHAUER (Albert N. Micheev) chapterid: 13 (Internationalization_Locale) communities: similar: rati