On Wed, 17 May 2000, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> > CGI::Session was an idea from 1995 [...]
>
> A tip of the hat to you, o brave and unusual netizen, for actually
> taking the time to _remove_ outdated information. I don't see that
> happen frequently enough.
Hey, with a five year timeout
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:23:02AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CGI::Session was an idea from 1995 that I never implemented and no longer
> intend to tackle. I get mail asking about it every few months -- I think
> it should be removed from the list so someone else can do it.
>
> CGI::Respo
CGI::Session was an idea from 1995 that I never implemented and no longer
intend to tackle. I get mail asking about it every few months -- I think
it should be removed from the list so someone else can do it.
CGI::Response is something I wrote. The responsible party is listed as
CGIP, which wa
