That is workable. I will go with a new top level namespace if that is
what folks think is best. I went with Net:: because the page that
discussed naming:
https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=pause_namingmodules
Explicitly lists HTTP as one of the protocols it was originally designed
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <51e1f571.6090...@savage.net.au>, Ron Savage
wrote:
> HTTP2::* is good, but after that perhaps an indicator of the draft
> status, to give HTTP2::Draft::*. This can be removed
Hi Steve
I don't see the need to put Net::* on the front of your namespace. Does
it actually add anything? See the last link for details on 'Net'.
HTTP2::* is good, but after that perhaps an indicator of the draft
status, to give HTTP2::Draft::*. This can be removed or changed later.
That w
Hello,
I am a 20 year veteran of perl coding, but have taken that long to get
around to a project that I think is worth sharing with the rest of the
community. I am taking part in the IETF httpbis working group and creating
an implementation of the HTTP-draft-04/2.0 specification. The initial go
