> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:33:58PM -0700, dormando wrote:
> > Yeah. Between memcached itself, MogileFS, and work I have a hard time
> > keeping up with C::M. It's been a lot of hard work keeping those other
> > queues down, and we've been just recently catching up with Perlbal.
> >
> > Hachi's be
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:33:58PM -0700, dormando wrote:
> Yeah. Between memcached itself, MogileFS, and work I have a hard time
> keeping up with C::M. It's been a lot of hard work keeping those other
> queues down, and we've been just recently catching up with Perlbal.
>
> Hachi's been expressi
Yeah. Between memcached itself, MogileFS, and work I have a hard time
keeping up with C::M. It's been a lot of hard work keeping those other
queues down, and we've been just recently catching up with Perlbal.
Hachi's been expressing interest in doing the work for C::M, and I think
we'll have some
http://domm.plix.at/perl/2012_05_10_dont_use_cache_memcached_for_utf8_strings.html
doesn't paint a great picture.
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=28095
makes things look even unhappier.
If you don't have time to clean out the RT queue, could you at least
do a release that specifi
