Doug - could you push out a new version of Gtop with this patch so that
the searching is fixed.
Thanks,
Sam Horrocks
> > if the search engine would index GTop.pod, then the package would turn up
> > with keywords such as memory, cpu, etc.
> ...
> > i do not plan any further documentatio
cool, thanks sam!
> if the search engine would index GTop.pod, then the package would turn up
> with keywords such as memory, cpu, etc.
...
> i do not plan any further documentation or advertising for GTop, but
> patches are welcome of course.
Here's a patch to generate the README from GTop.pod. It also add
if the search engine would index GTop.pod, then the package would turn up
with keywords such as memory, cpu, etc.
libgtop provides a common api to access data you normally see with a
broad range of system utilities: top, ifconfig, df, uptime, etc. the only
existing namespace i could see all this
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 03:35:06PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:22:13 -0800, Sam Horrocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Let's look at the other way - if I'm a perl programmer and want to find
> > a perl module that will return process memory usage how am I
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:22:13 -0800, Sam Horrocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Freshmeat doesn't seem to me like the right place to be searching for
> perl modules. In fact the description for libgtop on freshmeat doesn't
> even mention that it has a perl interface. Libgtop is first o
> If I search for 'memory process' on freshmeat, I find LibGTop as 18th
> hit. That's bad. Much better 'memory usage total processes' returns
> only LibGTop. In this case I'd blame the bad search engine at
> freahmeat that finding the library is so difficult.
Freshmeat doesn't seem to me lik
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:56:34 -0800, Sam Horrocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think GTop will work - I'll try that. Unfortunately it's very difficult
> to find because it's up at the root (why?), and its readme doesn't contain
> words like "memory" or "process" so it didn't show up in
I think GTop will work - I'll try that. Unfortunately it's very difficult
to find because it's up at the root (why?), and its readme doesn't contain
words like "memory" or "process" so it didn't show up in a search.
Wouldn't Sys::GTop would be preferable to a root-level GTop. At least
Sys would
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 04:20:31PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 01:21:30 -0800, Sam Horrocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > This module would attempt to tell you how much memory your process
> > is using, so your process could shutdown, restart or take other
> >
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 01:21:30 -0800, Sam Horrocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This module would attempt to tell you how much memory your process
> is using, so your process could shutdown, restart or take other
> actions if it is getting too large.
Is there really no module that does thi
This module would attempt to tell you how much memory your process is using,
so your process could shutdown, restart or take other actions if it is
getting too large.
The interface would be:
Sys::MemoryUsage->total_vm; # Total virtual memory in use.
Sys::MemoryUsage->data_segment
12 matches
Mail list logo
