On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:59:34 +0100
Rudolf Reuter wrote:
> I am very happy with Moin 1.9.
> It is stable, has all the features I need, and the pages are easy to
> backup with rsync. I think stability and reliability are more
> important for a wiki than fancy features.
+1
One feature I use a lot
Hello,
I am very happy with Moin 1.9.
It is stable, has all the features I need, and the pages are easy
to backup with rsync.
I think stability and reliability are more important for a wiki
than fancy features.
My only wish for the futur
On Thursday 24. March 2016 02.06.27 John Hurst wrote:
> These are very relevant questions from my perspective. I have been running
> a moin 1.9 site for 6 years or so, and having been promising people who
> comment on its weaker points that "Moin 2 is coming soon". But I am
> starting to lose tha
These are very relevant questions from my perspective. I have been running a
moin 1.9 site for 6 years or so, and having been promising people who comment
on its weaker points that "Moin 2 is coming soon". But I am starting to lose
that argument, and there are those who suggest that moving to
On Wednesday 23. March 2016 21.50.18 anton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just looked at moinmoin since a longer time period.
>
> The last bitbucket comit is about 9 months ago,
> so for me it looks thats its silently dead ...
> as your question has not got an answer since one month...
>
> Its sad.
Indeed.
Hi,
I just looked at moinmoin since a longer time period.
The last bitbucket comit is about 9 months ago,
so for me it looks thats its silently dead ...
as your question has not got an answer since one month...
Its sad.
Anton
Paul Boddie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess this isn't the most effect
Hello,
I guess this isn't the most effective place to ask this question, but I
suppose it reaches an audience who might also be wondering the same thing.
What is the current situation around MoinMoin development, with respect to
Moin 1.9 (which is noted as being the current production version)
