> is what you're seeing explained by this?
>
> http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/mon/2007-June/001637.html
>
Yeah, that's Murphy alright. Got a copy from CVS a week before Ed's email.
___
mon mailing list
mon@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mail
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Ben Ragg wrote:
> ...having a look through the code, there seems to be an evil bit of
> logic that will attempt to disable the hostgroup rather than the host
> when ever the host exists in a hostgroup by itself. What's worse is it
> appears it'll only attempt to disable the fi
On 8/16/07, Ben Ragg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hostgroup a
> foo
> ...having a look through the code, there seems to be an evil bit of
> logic that will attempt to disable the hostgroup rather than the host
> when ever the host exists in a hostgroup by itself. What's worse is it
> appears it
On 8/14/07, Blechman, Ronald I, Jr (Ron) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I've manually fixed these, and am willing to upload if this issue has
> not already been addressed.
It's probably worth submitting a bug report and attaching a patch:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mon
--
Augie Schwer
