On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:57:03AM -0400,
> David Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 64 lines which said:
>
>> The current code in CVS, which has been referred to by both myself
>> and Jim as either a 1.2.0 release candidate, or as a re
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:57:03AM -0400,
David Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 64 lines which said:
> The current code in CVS, which has been referred to by both myself
> and Jim as either a 1.2.0 release candidate, or as a releasable
> 1.2.0, is much better in many respects
But
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, David Nolan wrote:
> Well, I was hoping that Jim was going to respond to this, but since he
> hasn't I will.
Yeah yeah, I'm here, just busy :)
I'll commit to polishing up what needs to be polished (including any docs,
the ancient web page, and RPM packaging for FC6 and SLES10
On 4/2/07, P. Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello dear List,
>
> its for me some time ago that i have used mon. The system
> is still running so far. Now, i got a request for another
> monitoring concept.
>
> My question: Is mon still actively developed? I took a look
> at the list and it
