On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:46:25PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Stefan Manegold wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:38:51PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> >> I updated all MonetDB background (buildtools, MonetDB, clients)
> >>
> >> I just checked out M4 and during the compilation I got the
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:38:51PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> I updated all MonetDB background (buildtools, MonetDB, clients)
>
> I just checked out M4 and during the compilation I got the error:
>
> gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/ufs/goncalve/MonetDB/MonetDB4/src/tools
> -I../.. -I/ufs/g
I updated all MonetDB background (buildtools, MonetDB, clients)
I just checked out M4 and during the compilation I got the error:
gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/ufs/goncalve/MonetDB/MonetDB4/src/tools
-I../.. -I/ufs/goncalve/MonetDB/MonetDB4/src/tools
-I/ufs/goncalve/scratch/MonetDB/MonetDB/in
Stefan Manegold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:38:51PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
>> I updated all MonetDB background (buildtools, MonetDB, clients)
>>
>> I just checked out M4 and during the compilation I got the error:
>>
>> gcc -m64 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/ufs/goncalve/MonetDB/MonetDB4/s
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:26:00AM +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:13:52AM +, Niels Nes wrote:
> > Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/MonetDB5/src/mal
> > In directory sc8-pr-cvs7.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv9203/src/mal
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > mal_client.mx mal_ses
On 17-01-2007 14:28:55 +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
> > Time, unfortunately is scarce for me. So if you feel you can do the
> > job, I'd be glad to see the de-lowercasing of the MonetDB product
>
> I think you're saying the exact opposite of what you want.
Ehm... indeed... my bad :/
On 2007-01-17 14:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 17-01-2007 14:12:41 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
>> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 17-01-2007 13:48:59 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:54, Stefan Manegold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:34:18PM +, Jan Flokstra wrote:
> > Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah
> > In directory sc8-pr-cvs7.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv5537
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > pftijah.mx
> > Log Mess
On 17-01-2007 14:12:41 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 17-01-2007 13:48:59 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> >> Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> >>> Dear developers,
> >>>
> >>> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
> >>>
> >>> It would be nice to have MonetDB5
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:12:41PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 17-01-2007 13:48:59 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> >> Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> >>> Dear developers,
> >>>
> >>> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
> >>>
> >>> It would be nice to h
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 17-01-2007 13:48:59 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
>> Romulo Goncalves wrote:
>>> Dear developers,
>>>
>>> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have MonetDB5.conf instead of monet5.conf
>> instead of monetdb5.conf
>
> A conven
On 17-01-2007 13:48:59 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
> >
> > It would be nice to have MonetDB5.conf instead of monet5.conf
> instead of monetdb5.conf
A convention in the UNIX/Linux world
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:34:18PM +, Jan Flokstra wrote:
> Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs7.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv5537
>
> Modified Files:
> pftijah.mx
> Log Message:
> - repair "jan was right" bug. On 64 bit machines BUNtloc() is
Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
>
> It would be nice to have MonetDB5.conf instead of monet5.conf
instead of monetdb5.conf
>
> Regards,
> ROmulo
>
> -
> T
On 17-01-2007 13:42:13 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
>
> It would be nice to have MonetDB5.conf instead of monet5.conf
monetdb5.conf I would say.
--
Dear developers,
The M5 is now in source forge with the name MonetDB5.
It would be nice to have MonetDB5.conf instead of monet5.conf
Regards,
ROmulo
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net
On 2007-01-17 09:57, Jens Teubner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> recently, Jan and I have looked at some aspects of the
> Pathfinder/MonetDB build process. And we had the impression that there
> is some inconsistency in the current setup.
>
> The makefiles of all MonetDB-related projects currently include
Hi all,
recently, Jan and I have looked at some aspects of the
Pathfinder/MonetDB build process. And we had the impression that there
is some inconsistency in the current setup.
The makefiles of all MonetDB-related projects currently include
$MONETDB_CONFDIR/rules.mk. This file basically contai
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote:
> Henning,
>
> - you print the BAT *after* BATpropcheck has complained about (and fixed!)
> wrong properties
re-run with `Mserver -d0` / `Mtest.py -d0` to dis able property checking,
and check again / compare.
Stefan
> - it migh
Henning,
- you print the BAT *after* BATpropcheck has complained about (and fixed!)
wrong properties
- it might be either head or tail that BATpropcheck complains about
(internally, it checks only on head, but it's called for B & reverse(B))
- void columns are only key in case the seqbase i
I don't really understand the monetdb warning below, which I get when
running test cases for pf/tijah. it's actually nice that monetdb
performs all these BATpropchecks when running the test cases, but what's
actually the problem here? I printed the BAT and its info() now to check
myself, but can't
21 matches
Mail list logo
