Re: [Monetdb-developers] Q: pathfinder - cdata

2007-07-12 Thread Sjoerd Mullender
On 07/12/2007 08:46 PM, Arjen P. de Vries wrote: > I have two followup questions then: > > 1. > should > > not leave the CDATA intact and not replace the < to < ? > > Disclaimer: I am not very sure what should be correct. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xslt-xquery-serialization-20030502/ > state

Re: [Monetdb-developers] Q: pathfinder - cdata

2007-07-12 Thread Arjen P. de Vries
Thanks Sjoerd, Jens, that answers it. Any suggestion how to achieve what I am really after? I have an XML file with email addresses and names, and want to output a text string with "Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Now I use a web browser to

Re: [Monetdb-developers] Q: pathfinder - cdata

2007-07-12 Thread Arjen P. de Vries
I have two followup questions then: 1. should not leave the CDATA intact and not replace the < to < ? Disclaimer: I am not very sure what should be correct. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xslt-xquery-serialization-20030502/ states Note: This is phrased to permit an implementor to provide an op

Re: [Monetdb-developers] Q: pathfinder - cdata

2007-07-12 Thread Sjoerd Mullender
Arjen P. de Vries wrote: > While > > is accepted as a query, > > is not. > !parse error: syntax error, unexpected more><> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Sjoerd Mullender signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature - T

[Monetdb-developers] Q: pathfinder - cdata

2007-07-12 Thread Arjen P. de Vries
While is accepted as a query, is not. !parse error: syntax error, unexpected

Re: [Monetdb-developers] [M5] RFC: function shipping semantics

2007-07-12 Thread Fabian
On 12-07-2007 15:40:09 +0200, Martin Kersten wrote: > Simply put, function objects should be cast to strings before being thrown > and reparsed at the other side. Technically speaking that's fine with me. I don't expect anything else. >> For the case of put() I can think of the following which s

Re: [Monetdb-developers] [M5] RFC: function shipping semantics

2007-07-12 Thread Martin Kersten
That's a biggy for breakfast Fabian Groffen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like some input on an issue that I can't get a clear vision on for > now. > > Recently I added the remote module in MonetDB 5 which basically has 3 > functions which perform actions with a remote (MonetDB 5) server. The > func

[Monetdb-developers] [M5] RFC: function shipping semantics

2007-07-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi all, I'd like some input on an issue that I can't get a clear vision on for now. Recently I added the remote module in MonetDB 5 which basically has 3 functions which perform actions with a remote (MonetDB 5) server. The functions get, put and exec retrieve, store and execute an object from,