Re: [Monetdb-developers] [Monetdb-pf-checkins] pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc tjc_main.c, , 1.11, 1.12 tjc_milprint.c, , 1.10, 1.11

2009-02-01 Thread Stefan Manegold
Henning, JanF, should we actually consider testing the new tjc PFtijah parser next to the (AFAIK still default) "old" one? If so, how? Stefan On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:11:16AM +0100, Stefan Manegold wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:28:32PM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: > > On 2009-02-01 18:

Re: [Monetdb-developers] [Monetdb-pf-checkins] pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc tjc_main.c, , 1.11, 1.12 tjc_milprint.c, , 1.10, 1.11

2009-02-01 Thread Stefan Manegold
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:28:32PM +0100, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: > On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote: > > Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc > > In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc > > > > Modified Files: > > tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c

Re: [Monetdb-developers] [Monetdb-pf-checkins] pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc tjc_main.c, , 1.11, 1.12 tjc_milprint.c, , 1.10, 1.11

2009-02-01 Thread Sjoerd Mullender
On 2009-02-01 18:12, Henning Rode wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/monetdb/pathfinder/modules/pftijah/tjc > In directory 23jxhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21759/tjc > > Modified Files: > tjc_main.c tjc_milprint.c > Log Message: > propagated other retrieval models from old tijah implementa

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Stefan Manegold
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:15:06PM +0100, Lefteris wrote: > I will use lng instead of long long:) > > goto's are needed in the fromstr to make a faster and easier to read parser. > > The nil value should be indeed lng_nil, i had changed that but did not > checked it in. > > After debugging more,

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Lefteris
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Stefan Manegold wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Lefteris wrote: >> The following behavior is strange to me, but I am not sure if it is a >> bug or I have done something wrong. >> >> dayTimeDuration (dtduration) is defined in mil as: >> >> .ATOM dt

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Lefteris
I will use lng instead of long long:) goto's are needed in the fromstr to make a faster and easier to read parser. The nil value should be indeed lng_nil, i had changed that but did not checked it in. After debugging more, I saw that tostr is called twice and yes, I have changed it to 0 in the p

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Stefan Manegold
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Lefteris wrote: > The following behavior is strange to me, but I am not sure if it is a > bug or I have done something wrong. > > dayTimeDuration (dtduration) is defined in mil as: > > .ATOM dtduration = lng; > .FROMSTR = dtduration_fromstr; > .

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Sjoerd Mullender
There are several issues. - Use lng instead of long long for the typedef. The Visual Studio compiler doesn't know long long. - You're using a lot of goto's... - The nil value for dtduration should be lng_nil, not int_nil. But the real reason that it fails is that for some reason dtduration_tos

[Monetdb-developers] M4 Automatic multiplex version of .tostr: weird behavior

2009-02-01 Thread Lefteris
The following behavior is strange to me, but I am not sure if it is a bug or I have done something wrong. dayTimeDuration (dtduration) is defined in mil as: .ATOM dtduration = lng; .FROMSTR = dtduration_fromstr; .TOSTR = dtduration_tostr; .END; and in c as : typedef long long dtduratio

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M5-SQL current branch on Fedora 10

2009-02-01 Thread Stefan Manegold
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 12:23:21PM +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote: > I am not that new here... ;) > The bootstraap, configure and build deletion is always done when I > update my sources... > But until today I did not need to remove all the other directories (lib, > share, include...) under the pr

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M5-SQL current branch on Fedora 10

2009-02-01 Thread Romulo Goncalves
I am not that new here... ;) The bootstraap, configure and build deletion is always done when I update my sources... But until today I did not need to remove all the other directories (lib, share, include...) under the prefix installation. It seems I need to do it now because of the upgrade from

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M5-SQL current branch on Fedora 10

2009-02-01 Thread Lefteris
Delete your build directory and configure/rebuild everything. The libssl version (and probably more) has changed. lefteris On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Romulo Goncalves wrote: > Hello, > > I just start my mserver5 on Fedora 10 (my desktop) and I get several > messages like this one: > #WARNI

Re: [Monetdb-developers] M5-SQL current branch on Fedora 10

2009-02-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 01-02-2009 12:11:54 +0100, Romulo Goncalves wrote: > Hello, > > I just start my mserver5 on Fedora 10 (my desktop) and I get several > messages like this one: > #WARNING: LoaderException:loadLibrary:mdb: loader error libssl.so.6: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >

[Monetdb-developers] M5-SQL current branch on Fedora 10

2009-02-01 Thread Romulo Goncalves
Hello, I just start my mserver5 on Fedora 10 (my desktop) and I get several messages like this one: #WARNING: LoaderException:loadLibrary:mdb: loader error libssl.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory libssl.so.6 missing... All my sources are updated. Some suggestion