Re: [Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 1.0 RC1 Full Win32 Build

2006-12-19 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:44:03 -0500 "Michael D'Auria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Zed, > > I'm excited for Mongrel 1.0 final! I do have something i ran into before > and still is occurring with the new version. When i run into a 500 based > error i seem to get header information as output w

Re: [Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 1.0 RC1 Full Win32 Build

2006-12-19 Thread Michael D'Auria
Hey Zed, I'm excited for Mongrel 1.0 final! I do have something i ran into before and still is occurring with the new version. When i run into a 500 based error i seem to get header information as output when using mongrel: Status: 500 Internal Server Error Content-Type: text/html I still

[Mongrel] [ANN] Mongrel 1.0 RC1 Full Win32 Build

2006-12-19 Thread Zed A. Shaw
Hello Minions! It's *finally* here. Mongrel 1.0 RC1 for everyone to test, even the win32 folks. I managed to get everything to build on windows, including fastthread, and even cleaned up the "releases source":http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ so that it should install cleaner. Win32 wi

Re: [Mongrel] Mongrel version in headers

2006-12-19 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:45:17 -0800 "Graham White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to have mongrel not advertise itself or at least its > version in response headers ie. > Server: Mongrel 0.3.13.4 > > Sorry if I missed this directive in the docs but I couldn't find it > anywhere. Than

[Mongrel] Mongrel version in headers

2006-12-19 Thread Graham White
Is it possible to have mongrel not advertise itself or at least its version in response headers ie. Server: Mongrel 0.3.13.4 Sorry if I missed this directive in the docs but I couldn't find it anywhere. Thanks GW ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Luis Lavena
On 12/19/06, frazer horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis > > I am using your latest build of mongrel service in production with your > latest build of mongrel from your site too. Everything is running really > well. > I'm glad to heard, I was having troubles getting rubygem recognize my yaml d

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Ball, Donald A Jr \(Library\)
> I'll get you a win32 gem today. You're my hero. - donald ___ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:15:58 -0600 "Ball, Donald A Jr (Library)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure. Actually, I have a problem to report already... > > sessions are not working when I start mongrel in this > > fashion. Is there somewhere i should be configuring session > > behavior that I'm n

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:37:14 -0600 "Joey Geiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gives you 0.3.19 > $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases > > Gives you 0.3.20 > $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ Man that is SO annoying. Nobody can

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread frazer horn
Luis I am using your latest build of mongrel service in production with your latest build of mongrel from your site too. Everything is running really well. Do you have a build of fastthread for windows yet? Will fastthread even be available for win32? Thanks for all the excellent work Fraz

[Mongrel] mongrel_upload_progress + upload.rb +background (daemon?)

2006-12-19 Thread Jerrod Blavos
Im checking out the mongrel_upload_progress plugin and have it working beautifully on my dev box. however, now that i am ready to push this up into production i have run into a few gotchas that i cannot seem to find any documentation or examples for. the lib/upload.rb doesnt seem to want to

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Luis Lavena
On 12/19/06, Michael D'Auria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should upgrade to the newest version: 0.3.20 as it allows multiple > Set-Cookie header statements. > > For reference:http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/news.html > > To Install: > $ gem install fastthread > --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.or

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Joey Geiger
Gives you 0.3.19 $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases Gives you 0.3.20 $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases/ just FYI On 12/19/06, Michael D'Auria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should upgrade to the newest version: 0.3.20 as it

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Ball, Donald A Jr \(Library\)
Sadly, I cannot upgrade to 0.3.20 as I'm on win32, there's no gem available for it yet, and I apparently cannot compile the http parser (nmake launches cl.exe which complains: c:\ruby\lib\ruby\1.8\i386-mswin32\config.h(2) : fatal error C1189: #error : MSC version unmatch (In point of fact, thi

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Michael D'Auria
You should upgrade to the newest version: 0.3.20 as it allows multiple Set-Cookie header statements. For reference:http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/news.html To Install: $ gem install fastthread --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases $ gem install mongrel --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.or

Re: [Mongrel] Using a network drive to share files between Mongrel/Rails instances...?

2006-12-19 Thread Wayne E. Seguin
Kris, Another option, depending on the size of the files of course, is to create a secondary database for the application and store the files within that database. I am not claiming that this is optimal for your instance, just that it is a very effective option and should be at least though

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Joey Geiger
This is something I mentioned on here to Zed, and he said it will be fixed coming up with the next release. I do know that 0.3.14 works, which I believe was the last stable release for ruby (and 0.3.13 which was the windows stable release?) On 12/19/06, Ball, Donald A Jr (Library) <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Ball, Donald A Jr \(Library\)
> Sure. Actually, I have a problem to report already... > sessions are not working when I start mongrel in this > fashion. Is there somewhere i should be configuring session > behavior that I'm not? > > To be more specific, the browser doesn't report a session_id > cookie in its cookie list. T

Re: [Mongrel] mongrel_cluster: selective restarts

2006-12-19 Thread Bradley Taylor
> I have 'developed'[1] a small extension to mongrel_cluster that allows > selective restart of any one listener in a configuration that contains > more than one listener by using a command like > > mongrel_rails cluster::selectivestart -c config.file -p 3000 > > This will try to find a liste

Re: [Mongrel] running mongrel in production on win32

2006-12-19 Thread Ball, Donald A Jr \(Library\)
> > I'm using mongrel-0.3.13.3-mswin32, the latest publicly available > > mswin32 gem, along with mongrel_service-0.2, though I'm not > using the > > service in development. I tried to install 0.3.19 but got odd > > compilation warnings when I did so and the server failed to start. > > That is