Re: [Mongrel] deciphering objects.log

2007-10-13 Thread Zed A. Shaw
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:52:24 -0400 "Evan Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Zed, do you think we should remove the object.log? My guess is that it > leads people astray as much as it helps. I don't hear anyone complaining it leads them astray. I've used it to find plenty of leaks. If you

Re: [Mongrel] vista on mongrel

2007-10-13 Thread Luis Lavena
On 10/13/07, Raj Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis, > > I just tried the mongrel 1.0.2 rc. Unfortunately, it does not improve the > speed > with or without ...= :PStore. > > With this and the previous version of mongrel at start, I see the message > ** Ruby version is not up-to-date: loa

Re: [Mongrel] vista on mongrel

2007-10-13 Thread Luis Lavena
On 10/13/07, Raj Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for a a quick response, Luis. > > I am using Ruby 1.8.5 and Rails 1.2.3 > > According to the comment in ruby source In 1.8.5 the default is pstore. > Could you please tell me the specific changes that you did to the > environment > to

Re: [Mongrel] vista on mongrel

2007-10-13 Thread Luis Lavena
On 10/13/07, Raj Prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am having the exact same problem described by Jonah Fox here: > > http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-May/003647.html > > I was wondering if you have found a solution yet. It is not the session > issue. > Are you sure