[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2008-03-19 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190 Joachim Plack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2008-07-23 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c15 Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2008-08-05 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c16 --- Comment #16 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-05 06:31:26 MDT --- I confirm the improvement : but MS.NET performs still 50% bet

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2008-08-05 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c17 --- Comment #17 from Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-05 07:48:04 MDT --- Well, the bug title no longer applies (".NET is twice faster as

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c4 --- Comment #4 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 07:58:29 MST --- Created an attachment (id=183699) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=183699) Vmware test screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bu

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c3 --- Comment #3 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 07:55:44 MST --- Note that i'm using linux when I test Mono 1.2.6 I've done some test with mono on windows I obtain : 18s with Mono on windows and 10 s with .NET on th

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c2 --- Comment #2 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 07:54:09 MST --- no... the file is created and loaded on the local filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You ar

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c5 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 08:36:45 MST --- Please add a complete program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c7 --- Comment #7 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 09:11:19 MST --- Created an attachment (id=183721) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=183721) TestZipSpeed.exe (exe file) usage mono ./TestZipSpeed.exe

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c1 Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-16 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c6 --- Comment #6 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-16 09:10:18 MST --- Created an attachment (id=183720) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=183720) Main.cs (source) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-19 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c8 Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-19 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c9 --- Comment #9 from Hubert FONGARNAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-20 00:56:16 MST --- The test are made with the CSharpZipLib taken from the mono gac... The test are made on exactly the same CSharpZipLib with mono and MS.NET -- Configu

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c10 --- Comment #10 from Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-20 06:09:19 MST --- I run some tests on the same machine (Windows XP, Intel Core Duo 2, 2GHz): randomfile.bin == MS.NET /ziptest.exe randomfile.bin ICSharpCode

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c11 Marek Safar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c12 --- Comment #12 from Marek Safar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-20 09:12:46 MST --- my comment should be - Our JIT does NOT use SSE instructions for Math.Min and Math.Max. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c13 Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-20 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190#c14 --- Comment #14 from Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-11-20 12:32:02 MST --- Min/Max intrinsics are now implemented, but seem to make no difference to the performance of this benchmark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.nove

[Mono-bugs] [Bug 342190] [Performance] MS.NET 2.0 is twice faster as mono 1.2. 6 when compressing with SharpZipLib

2007-11-23 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=342190 Massimiliano Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC|