Hi all !
I continue my trip in the Mono's land, and now, I try to
compile a Java program with ikvmc to obtain a .exe file wich I want to
run over Mono.
But it doesn't work...
1 ) javac test.java
2 ) ikvmc test.class -r:IKVM.GNU.Classpath.dll (the dll is
Hi,
Just a heads up to say I've updated my mono-compiling page and uploaded
version 0.9b of my updater script.
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/mono/mono-compiling.html
At the bottom, you'll notice some ideas I have for the updater which
will include packaging builds. My problem is that I
Excellent thanks Dean!
On 6/3/05, Dean Brettle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:00 +0200, Luke Venediger wrote:
Hi All,
What does the community think of the idea of sponsoring developers to
fix Mono bugs?
FYI, I believe you can already do this via:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:00 +0200, Luke Venediger wrote:
What does the community think of the idea of sponsoring developers to
fix Mono bugs? For example, you might be developing for the mono
runtime and there is a bug that is preventing you from going any
further with your project. You could
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 20:27 +0200, Martin Baulig wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:00 +0200, Luke Venediger wrote:
What does the community think of the idea of sponsoring developers to
fix Mono bugs? For example, you might be developing for the mono
runtime and there is a bug that is
Finalizers are run by one thread, so once you are in one, no new objets
will get finalized behind your back.
However, I'm not sure if the spec promises that at all.
No, no such promise in the spec. In fact, some MS people are talking
about using more than one GC thread in future releases,
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:40 -0700, Todd Berman wrote:
While I don't agree with bounties on specific bugs, I also don't agree
with what you are saying at all. No one fixes a boring bug for free
anyway today. There are 2 types of people fixing them
1) People who need the fix.
2) People who
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 07:46 +1000, Michi Henning wrote:
Finalizers are run by one thread, so once you are in one, no new objets
will get finalized behind your back.
However, I'm not sure if the spec promises that at all.
No, no such promise in the spec. In fact, some MS people are
