You may need to allocate a TimeStamp descriptor. OciHandle might need
to be modified to create a TimeStamp descirptor. See the difference
between a DATE and TIMESTAMP in table 3-2 below. Notice how DATE is a
char[7] while TIMESTAMP is a descriptor which uses opache type of
OCIDateTime.
http://d
Trying to compile some C# code that uses generics on mono in
Linux (gentoo). I ran across the following problem (which is probably
just unimplemented functionality).
public static T
QueryInterface(object val)
where T : class
{
if (val == null)
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 22:31 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello Carlos,
>
> > I'm attaching a patch which adds support for publisher policy files
> > ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> > us/cpguide/html/cpconcreatingpublisherpolicyfile.asp ), which allows to
> > r
Hello,
> As part of a project I have to study the mcs, especially those
> structures corresponding to a symbol table, which shall later be used
> in a source code analyzer. In the mcs, those symbol-table-like data
> structures are just parts of the tree created when parsing. To get
> some
Hello Carlos,
> I'm attaching a patch which adds support for publisher policy files
> ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> us/cpguide/html/cpconcreatingpublisherpolicyfile.asp ), which allows to
> redirect one assembly version to another.
The patch looks good to me.
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 18:23 -0700, Todd Berman wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 02:36 +0200, Mario Sopena wrote:
> > Hola,
> >
> > On 7/30/05, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am curious how this works. My copy of gecko# is 0.6, and it is built
> > > against gtk# 2.0, this prevents it
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 02:36 +0200, Mario Sopena wrote:
> Hola,
>
> On 7/30/05, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am curious how this works. My copy of gecko# is 0.6, and it is built
> > against gtk# 2.0, this prevents it from being used to built monodoc. So
> > this check here doesn't w
Hola,
On 7/30/05, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious how this works. My copy of gecko# is 0.6, and it is built
> against gtk# 2.0, this prevents it from being used to built monodoc. So
> this check here doesn't work.
Where did you get this gecko# 0.6? Because the one in SVN is g
Hey everybody,
after being stucked for a couple of days because of a stupid error
that I made, I've finally added some improvements to the gecko patch.
* Gecko support is now only built when gecko-sharp is present
(GeckoHtmlRender.dll). Gecko-sharp is not a requirement now.
* The HtmlRender.
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 02:08 +0200, Mario Sopena wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> after being stucked for a couple of days because of a stupid error
> that I made, I've finally added some improvements to the gecko patch.
>
> * Gecko support is now only built when gecko-sharp is present
> (GeckoHtml
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 2005-29-07 at 13:07 -0400, Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
> With Mono's implementation, it's really easy to use the RSA Crypto
> classes because it doesn't generate a key automatically on construction.
yes, this is done by default.
> I'm developing an application with Windows as
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 19:21 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
> >>From Kornel:
> >> BTW what about the 2.0.0.0 patch?
> >
> > I'd still like to kill all the #if NET_1_1 crap in the files and use
> > MonoConsts.FxVersion or something. It will save us pain in the future.
>
> In this case I would like to do s
Disk space is cheap. I can get disk space for under $0.50 per Gigabyte.
If you want to measure performance gains, they have to be in terms of
time (reducing the number of pages read from disk: ie, show that you
save at least 1 page from being read from the disk) or memory (show that
you save at le
http://www.espacioblog.com/luffy
:) only for informati
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
With Mono's implementation, it's really easy to use the RSA Crypto
classes because it doesn't generate a key automatically on construction.
I'm developing an application with Windows as a target, since ATM my
family uses it and it currently has a large userbase.
I've tried out using CspParameters
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 18:10 +0200, Andreas Nahr wrote:
> And as you said it will be near to impossible to measure performance
> gains, because you would need to instrument the OS itself.
>From Kornel:
> Note that the things I said earlier in this thread and above are only a
> discussion about poss
Hi,
This looks ok to commit.
Zoltan
On 7/29/05, Carlos Alberto Cortez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> The attached patch fixes the behavior for GetReferencedAssemblies (it
> used to load the references and get the info from them, instead of
> get
When building NLog (http://nlog.sf.net) with Mono, the resulting dll
works on Mono but not on Windows .NET. If the .dll is built with csc,
then it works both on .NET and Mono (both Windows and Linux).
The symptom is that the simple test program can't run. But I don't
understand what's causing it
Kornel already said that: its just a suggestion. And as you said it will be
near to impossible to measure performance gains, because you would need to
instrument the OS itself. However one thing is clear, you could save
assembly size (and with it OS disc cache and so on).
And it would allow us t
Hi!
As part of a project I have to study the mcs, especially those
structures corresponding to a symbol table, which shall later be used
in a source code analyzer. In the mcs, those symbol-table-like data
structures are just parts of the tree created when parsing. To get
some snapshots of
I think that these removals could result in disk space save rather than in
much better performance. Anyway I think eliminating unnecessary data is good
altough is not critical. Now I understand why it's better to have
optimalizers outside compilers but I think compilation performance may be
better
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 09:32 +0200, Andreas Nahr wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ben Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Andreas Nahr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Kornél Pál" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miguel de Icaza"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 1:15 AM
> Subject
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 11:00 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
> I agree with you. I don't like the fact that the compiler embeds private
> constants altough they are not used at all. Furthermore in a lot of cases
> private enumerations are not required at runtime.
>
> I think we don't need any special obfu
I've made a new patch... It worked when I send a timestamp in string format,
but with binary format it fails after binding parameters t... with an
undebuggable error:
Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set
to an instance of an object
in <0x0>
in (wrappe
The implementation of Type.GUID currently always returns an empty GUID.
I believe in MS it will return the Guid specified by a GuidAttribute on
the Type.
I can post a patch if desired. I noticed a lot of other methods on the
Type are done as internal calls. Should this be the case with the GUID?
O
Friends,
I am running Apache on top of XSP.
I created a folder /NetLinux and running XSP from that folder.
I have index.aspx and index.aspx.cs files available in the same folder. When
I used http://localhost:8080 I am getting the following error.
Server Error in '/' Application
Parser Error
De
Hello!
--- Muthiah Annamalai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem I think is with Installation.
> Can someone please help me?
I fixed the problem, thanks to a bug in compilation
of the C library.
export MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug
and running my program fixed the issue, its really
cool,
because I go
Hi!
Im trying to access C library from MONO/C#.
The error I get when trying to access the code is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/g2-0.70/mono/src ] make
mcs --unsafe --target library g2.cs -o g2.dll
Compilation succeeded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/g2-0.70/mono/src ]
Hey,
The attached patch fixes the behavior for GetReferencedAssemblies (it
used to load the references and get the info from them, instead of
getting it from the metadata tables, just like MS impl).
It also fix a problem when calling this with a Reflection Only assembly.
The corlib nunit tests r
;return "OciDate";
>> >+ case OciDataType.TimeStamp:
>> >+ return "TimeStamp";
>> >default:
>> >
gt;>> >return OracleType.VarChar;
>>> >case OciDataType.OciDate:
>>> > return OracleType.DateTime;
>>> >+ case OciDataType.TimeStamp:
>>>
OracleType.DateTime;
>>> >+ case OciDataType.TimeStamp:
>>> >+ return OracleType.Timestamp;
>>> >default:
>>> >throw new NotImplementedExcepti
case OciDataType.OciDate:
>>> >return OracleType.DateTime;
>>> >+ case OciDataType.TimeStamp:
>>> >+ return OracleType.Timestamp;
>>> >
I think you need the devel package for apache.
Carlos.
El vie, 29-07-2005 a las 09:12 +, Rajesh Kumar Aggani escribió:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I want to use Mono on Red Hat linux Server edition. I have installed Mono
> with binary file. Apache is already installed during RedHat installation.
>
>
pe.TimeStamp:
>> >+ return "TimeStamp";
>> >default:
>> >return "Unknown";
>> >}
>> >Index:
>> &
case OciDataType.OciDate:
>> >return "OciDate";
>> >+ case OciDataType.TimeStamp:
>> >+ return "TimeStamp";
>> >
Hi,
Last night I put together a basic autopackage of MonoDevelop. I also wrote a
simple C stub program to replace the startup shell script, so it can be fully
relocatable.
I haven't tested the package extensively, beyond a simple "does it install and
run?" check. A MonoDevelop developer would be
I agree with you. I don't like the fact that the compiler embeds private
constants altough they are not used at all. Furthermore in a lot of cases
private enumerations are not required at runtime.
I think we don't need any special obfuscator or Cecil tool we just should
add two compiler options t
Duncan Mak wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 13:36 +0200, Heinz Mueller wrote:
Now to the subject: when trying out a program from the fist
mentioned book (a clock with Bezier spline hands with System.Drawing)
I got an value out of range exception in the points array of
DrawBeziers.
I looked up the s
Le Vendredi 29 Juillet 2005 02:48, vous avez écrit :
> You need to modify OciDefineHandle to deal with the TIMESTAMP.
>
> See Define(), DefineDate(), and GetValue().
>
> You can create a new function called DefineTimestamp() based on
> DefineDate() and allocate space for it based OciDataType.TimeSt
I like it a lot ;)
Sorry for the previous discussion. I've gone through this quite a few times
before.
Also what I wrote was just a suggestion. I personally would like to have
seen your initial patch applied if the one for WebContols wasn't created.
But its just much better this way ;)
So tha
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andreas Nahr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Kornél Pál" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miguel de Icaza"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] [PATCH] Profile 2.0 assembly versions
This is the better way using a slash to separate a
directory. I tested it and it builds successfully on
Cygwin and Linux.
SQLSHARP_GTK_LIBS = $(GTK_SHARP_LIBS)
/r:System.Data.dll /r:Mono.Data.dll
/r:../browser/Mono.Data.SqlSharp.DatabaseBrowser.dll
The fix has been committed to svn trunk HEAD.
43 matches
Mail list logo
