Nothing intentionally disabled. Just ignorance when writing the original
DllImports.
Thanks for the patch, looks good, please commit.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: "John Luke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Date: Thursday, 01 June, 2006 21:24
Subject: [Mono-dev] patch for MWF and g
Hello,
A small patch for MWF to read the gtk colors without the gtk dev
packages installed.
Of course, I am not sure if you intentionally disabled it or something.
Index: System.Windows.Forms/X11DesktopColors.cs
===
--- System.Window
Whilst spiking a proof of concept of mono on Sybase 11 I couldnt connect
to the server
I tracked it down to tds.language="us_english", this errors in the
connection with:
Mono.Data.SybaseClient.SybaseException: Internal error occurred while
converting characters.
cant work out why, because
Hi,
Building on ppc seems to be broken.
I tried with the daily tarball package
http://mono.ximian.com/daily/mono-1.1.15.20060601.tar.gz
Is anyone else seeing this?
Joachim Ante
-
exceptions-ppc.c:557: error: parse error before "else"
exceptions-ppc.c:567: warning: type defaults to `int' in
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 08:13 -0700, Andrew Skiba wrote:
[...]
> If no one objects, I will commit.
Don't commit. It's a hack that fixes the problem for you, but we don't
know why that happens.
-Gonzalo
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@li
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 13:25 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When mono crashes for example because of a missing assembly mod-mono-server
> will not be restarted automatically that causes Service Unavailable error
> pages.
>
> The attached patch restarts mod-mono-server if the socket cannot be
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:09 +0200, Gert Driesen wrote:
[...]
> I can take care of committing the patch in trunk/release (after I've
> gotton approval to do this ofcourse), but who can take care of updates
> the masterinfos tars ?
I'll take care of updating the tar.gz's at the server.
-Gonzalo
_
Hi,
The attached patch adds class status pages for the following assemblies:
* System.Configuation (2.0)
* System.ServiceProcess (1.1 and 2.0)
* System.Transactions (2.0)
There are two parts to this update:
- A patch for the update-status script, index-1.1.src and index-2.0.src.
This patch s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
No, every interface is implemented by a different class.
Do you think is better to rename all the methods or wait for a solution?
You may use the patch that is attached to this bug.
Robert
pablo
- Original Message - From: "Eyal Alaluf" <[EMAIL PROTEC
From my experience it's better to reduce the application to a small sample.
During this effort you may stumble upon extra factors that are part of the bug
that would be easier to workaround and important for getting the bug fixed.
Eyal.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu,
Hi,
No, every interface is implemented by a different class.
Do you think is better to rename all the methods or wait for a solution?
pablo
- Original Message -
From: "Eyal Alaluf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, J
Hi.
Are the interfaces implemented by the same class? This could explain quite a
bit, actually.
Eyal.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:33:19 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com, Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:
Well, the funny thing is that the problems I detected are between methods
in... different interfaces!!
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: [Mono-dev] Re: Ambiguous matching in method resolution
Ympostor
Ympostor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
And more info yet.
The methods that seem to have trouble are the following:
- The server is "publishing" several interfaces under different
"service names" by remoting.
- There are methods with the same name and different signatures on
different
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
And more info yet.
The methods that seem to have trouble are the following:
- The server is "publishing" several interfaces under different "service
names" by remoting.
- There are methods with the same name and different signatures on
different interfaces.
- T
15 matches
Mail list logo
