Atsushi Eno wrote:
We do support multi AppDomain. Your complaints on bug #76757 is
too tiny to be taken care on this general information. Or are you
saying that we should say we don't support generics because there
are some bugs ?
All I know is that I'm tired of patching every copy of Mono I
You don't understand what I wrote. *Every* bugs could block people.
IF we write notes that your code might not work if you use ...
with related to *every* bugs (EVEN IF it is possible), that
web info becomes pretty useless because of such flood of extraneous
information.
You could have just
Hello Atsushi,
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 16:50 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
I have some X509Certificate fixes for constructors and Equals(),
Looks fine :)
Please move the new tests, in X509CertificateTest.cs, between the NON
GENERATED CODE comments (near the start of the file) in case I
Hello,
I have some X509Certificate fixes for constructors and Equals(),
Looks fine :)
Please move the new tests, in X509CertificateTest.cs, between the NON
GENERATED CODE comments (near the start of the file) in case I
regenerate the file someday.
Okay, done.
attached (ChangeLog
Hello,
Feel free to augment the page with your experiences or with tools,
tricks and tips that might be useful to others.
Probably add a suggestion to never create more than one AppDomain under Mono.
I will add the semantics of our current AppDomain behavior.
Miguel.
Hello,
DateTime.TryParse()
I got a simplistic implementation of this recently.
Miguel.
OleDb.Parameters.AddWithValue();
Also the equivilant OleDb.Parameters.Add(); signature needs to be
marked obsolete.
Regards,
Justin Dearing
___
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have created a new page on the Wiki to serve as a tutorial to help
people who want to port their applications from Windows to Linux to have
a central location to look for information, the page is:
http://www.mono-project.com/Guidelines:Application_Portability
Hello,
You don't understand what I wrote. *Every* bugs could block people.
IF we write notes that your code might not work if you use ...
with related to *every* bugs (EVEN IF it is possible), that
web info becomes pretty useless because of such flood of extraneous
information.
You could
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I will add the semantics of our current AppDomain behavior.
Thank you. Sorry for the caustic attitude.
--Brian
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hi,
I found a bug using Mono 1.13.8 on Windows XP using gmcs.
I have posted this as Bug 78982 in Bugzilla.
This code will not compile:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace Test.Bug
{
public sealed class Test
{
Hi Miguel,
I have created a new page on the Wiki to serve as a
tutorial to help people who want to port their applications
from Windows to Linux to have a central location to look for
information, the page is:
http://www.mono-project.com/Guidelines:Application_Portability
Charlie Poole wrote:
Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single domain
causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using Multiple
AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than never create more
than one I'll be interested in reading what the issues
Hello,
Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single domain
causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using Multiple
AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than never create more
than one I'll be interested in reading what the issues are.
The
I upgraded cygwin this weekend and since I've had trouble building mono. I was building fine up until this weekend. The error I keep getting is:Making all in metadatamake[3]: Entering directory `/home/HP_Administrator/mono/mono/metadata'
.deps/assembly.Plo:1: *** multiple target patterns.
Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu:
4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui?
I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on
MS .NET. Am I wrong?
--
Felipe.
___
Hi Miguel
Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single
domain causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using
Multiple AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than
never create more than one I'll be interested in reading
what the issues
Hi Brian,
Charlie Poole wrote:
Oddly enough, loading our NUnit 2.4 test assemblies under a single
domain causes it to fail. We're making it work under Mono by using
Multiple AppDomains. So I assume the problem is more subtle than
never create more than one I'll be interested in
Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu:
4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui?
I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on
MS .NET. Am I wrong?
Here are my 2 guesses as to why GTK# is
Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-07-31 às 15:21 -0700, Charlie Poole escreveu:
4) Shouldn't there be a section on using GTK# as a cross-platform Gui?
I thought SWF/MWF was more portable because it runs out-of-the-box on
MS .NET. Am I wrong?
Your WinForms application will never be
19 matches
Mail list logo
