Hi all,
I want to report on my recent experiences getting the C# port of
BouncyCastle Crypto API (http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharp/) running on
Mono. It will be a reasonably brief report as it turned out to be mostly
painless :).
(BC is written entirely in C# for .NET 1.1 by the way).
Here
Hello,
> I'd prefer the "pure" approach, meaning using your original
> EventLogMessages.dll.
>
> But we need approval from Miguel on this.
Someone please send me a summary ;-)
My feeling: I dont know why we need another dll.
Miguel
___
Mono-devel-li
Sergey Tikhonov wrote:
> Zoltan Varga wrote:
>
>> Yes, it doesn't work because they are not implemented.
>>
>> The logic is the following: get_vcall_slot_addr () should determine
>> whenever the
>> call which called the trampoline is a virtual call, and if it is, then
>
>
> Ok. I was comparing di
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornél Pál
> Sent: zondag 20 augustus 2006 19:01
> To: Gert Driesen; 'Robert Jordan'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] local file based EventLog implementatio
Hello:
> Should the Firebird provide be built against 1.1 and 2.0, or only one of
> them?
That will depend on wheter 2.0 sources of the provider can be added to
the mono repository
( that sources will work only with the 2.0 profile, but there are
changes on the assembly name,
now it's FirebirdSq
>> > b) adding EventLogMessages.dll to the binary distributions (for
>> win32,
>> > and linux too)
>> >
>> > If we do not get approval for (b) (not sure why, but could be
>> > ofcourse), then we could still embed the dll into the System assembly
> > and extract it at runtime (if it doesn't exist ye
Hello,
> I have done two changes to the build of the FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird
> assembly to try to not generate always the same assembly version, but
> i can't test it right now :(
Should the Firebird provide be built against 1.1 and 2.0, or only one of
them?
> Can somebody try to build the a
Janne Rantala wrote:
> 2006/8/20, Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I can reproduce it. The socket connection to the web server
>> hosting the web service remains open after the first
>> mono_runtime_exec_managed_code terminates and the second
>> run freezes the process.
>>
>> If I use mono_thr
This link should be helpful -
Implementing an Implicit Transaction using Transaction Scope
(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172152.aspx)
Transaction.Current property (ambient transaction) refers to the
"current" transaction which can be used by DbCommand etc to find out
whether it is b
2006/8/20, Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I can reproduce it. The socket connection to the web server
> hosting the web service remains open after the first
> mono_runtime_exec_managed_code terminates and the second
> run freezes the process.
>
> If I use mono_thread_attach, everything works
Hi!
Case revert r63894 one of tests for System.Web.UI.WebControls.Style.cs
failed.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hi, Gonzalo!
Modification r63894 for 1.x is refactoring only, that's why
I did not include a relevant test:
Old code:
if ((styles &
Styles.CssClass) != 0)
{
Hello:
I have done two changes to the build of the FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird
assembly
to try to not generate always the same assembly version, but i can't test
it right now :(
Can somebody try to build the assembly with the patches attached to this
email and
let me know if they are correct,
Hi,
this is not really a noteworthy comment but I'd like to say that you've
forgotten a trailing "=" on your "Implementation Details" heading.
As for the implementation of System.Transactions could please someone explain
to me how they work. I understand the basic principle but what I don't
un
14 matches
Mail list logo
