Aye, I'm on the list now. Just have to set up a label for it. I'll
post code and more info about Jeto on a new page in the wiki so it can
be considered. This project looks like some fun.
On 10/31/06, Brian Crowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Lahti wrote:
> > I have expressed support for t
William Lahti wrote:
> I have expressed support for the managed kernel idea because I am
> already in the process of building a managed operating system. I call
> it Jeto. Currently it consists of...
That figures. We've already drafted budgets and purchased an office.
Kidding, kidding. Sort of. M
Related to Microsoft's C# and .NET trademarks:
I have been referring to .NET as the Common Language Infrastructure,
but C#... well C# is really it's name. Would it be better to call it
ECMA-335 :)?
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.x
Aww, I let the thread go for a bit and it's packed!
I have expressed support for the managed kernel idea because I am
already in the process of building a managed operating system. I call
it Jeto. Currently it consists of...
- A GNU/Linux distribution with a new filesystem layout
- A foundation li
Since the idea of a managed operating system has been discussed at
length on the mono-devel-list, I went ahead and registered sharpos.org!
I encourage anyone interested in developing a managed operating system
to visit http://sharpos.org
Please start editing the wiki and sign up for the mailing
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
> SF doesn't offer a Wiki do they? For the initial brainstorming of this
> project, a wiki would work great.
If I'm reading the Sourceforge docs right, you should be able to install a
PHP-based wiki (such as MediaWiki) without too much trouble:
http://sourceforge.net/doc
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
> I did a little research and it looks like it is possible to install
> MediaWiki, although it can be painful at times.
You could go the Google Project Hosting route. They offer Subversion hosting
and their own (primitive) issue tracking service:
http://code.google.com
I did a little research and it looks like it is possible to install MediaWiki, although it can be painful at times.
Anyway, Michael Schurter contacted me and said that he has some space
on his hosting account. He is going to register www.sharpos.org and set
up MediaWiki. We can better communicate
True. But there are projects such as SharpDevelop who haven't been harrassed
yet.
SF doesn't offer a Wiki do they? For the initial brainstorming of this
project, a wiki would work great.
Victor Costan wrote:
>
> Two issues come to mind:
>
> 1) C# and J# are registered by Microsoft. Let's make
Two issues come to mind:
1) C# and J# are registered by Microsoft. Let's make sure the # can't cause
trouble :)
2) You don't know if this'll work or tank, so I suggest using sf.net, and
getting free project hosting from them, at least for a while.
Either way, please let us know how this is going
...try from here:
http://mhenriquez.no-ip.com/descargas/
but please move the kernel.rar file to other place when you can access,
is a very unestable server...sorry
...at least is an object oriented kernel emulator.
Mauricio
Brian Crowell wrote:
> Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
>
>> all that I men
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
> Actually if it's all the same, I'd like to keep this operating system
> separate from the Unix mentality. That's not to say we wouldn't borrow some
> of Unix's ways of doing things, but there are certain things that would need
> to be changed.
There are lots of things to
So does anyone have any problems with calling this project SharpOS? If not,
I'll register www.sharpos.org right now and set up a wiki.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Mono-devel-list--Operating-System-in-C--Project-tf2349909.html#a7087087
Sent from the Mono - Dev ma
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
> all that I mention is in C#, please keep in mind that is a "probe of
> concepts" test code, is not a serious effor as the proposed in this
> thread, I love to work on this proyect, I know about assembler on
> windows, linux and a little IL, I also know a lote of OSs b
I would like to conjecture that a good MSIL -> native compiler work make the
C# memory management code execute at the same speed as compiled C code.
After all, C code gets converted to an intermediate language too, as part of
the compilation. Both methods express the same computations, so it should
Hi, Mauricio and Brian! To everyone else -- I'm sending this to the entire
list so that people that might be interested in see there's more interest.
I'm interested in the managed OS idea. I've written some thoughts about this
some time ago, just search for my thoughts through the archive.
Mauric
...tell me if you have problems with the rar attached files...
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
> all that I mention is in C#, please keep in mind that is a "probe of
> concepts" test code, is not a serious effor as the proposed in this
> thread, I love to work on this proyect, I know about assembler o
I would love to see what you have accomplished so far. What portion of what
you mentioned is in C#?
Mauricio Henriquez wrote:
>
> sorry, what is the main idea??, develop a operating system in C#, sorry
> I lost the first post.
> If that is the case, I have a prototype OS in C# (for educational
Michael Schurter wrote:
>
> Brian Crowell wrote:
>> jmacdonagh wrote:
>>> Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed
>>> around with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional
>>> operating system development to learn a little more.
>>
>> What interests me
Patch number 2.
Added support for CacheEntryNotFound, RequestProhibitedByCachePolicy
and RequestProhibitedByProxy in the WebExceptionStatus.cs enum in the
System.Net namespace.
Regards,
Jensen
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (re
sorry, what is the main idea??, develop a operating system in C#, sorry
I lost the first post.
If that is the case, I have a prototype OS in C# (for educational
pospuses only), offcourse is very, very, very basic, for the moment only
open one or more "proto-assembler" files (like compiled progra
I'd vote for the first one, if mono compiles correctly with it. If
not, you'd have to patch also the places where it was used.
On 10/30/06, Jensen Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed some typo's in the FtpStatusCode enum in the System.Net namespace.
> The word "available" is miss spelled
I noticed some typo's in the FtpStatusCode enum in the System.Net namespace.
The word "available" is miss spelled as "avalaible".
I created two patches to fix this issue.
The first removes the miss spelled words and adds the correct spelling,
the second patch only adds the correct spelled words bu
Hello,
> The attached patch implements
>
> 1) DirectoryInfo.GetDirectories with SearchOption.AllDirectories
>
> 2) NameValueConfigurationCollection.Properties
> this facilitates implementation of WWF configuration properties like:
> http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.workf
Brian Crowell wrote:
> jmacdonagh wrote:
>> Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed
>> around with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional
>> operating system development to learn a little more.
>
> What interests me most about this is a C# program as a
With MD, the only way you can really build mcs classes is to open
Makefile in MD.
.csproj is obviously unused one. Just removed.
Atsushi Eno
Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
> I get:
>
> [mcs/class/System.XML/System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs, Line=51, Column=29,
> Type=Error, Description=The
Levi Bard wrote:
>
>> Meaning, what language or runtime environment would my
>> operating system consider first-class. I could choose C/C++, but that
>> locks
>> people into a language. Instead, I could choose IL, which can be
>> generated
>> by any number of languages.
>
> This one's a pretty
Brian Crowell wrote:
>
> What interests me most about this is a C# program as a first-class
> citizen, or really, every API in the system being not only available, but
> *designed for* managed programs.
>
Right. I dislike how current mainstream operating systems regard executables
as "just ano
jmacdonagh wrote:
> Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed around
> with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional operating
> system development to learn a little more.
What interests me most about this is a C# program as a first-class citizen, or
reall
I get:
[mcs/class/System.XML/System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs, Line=51, Column=29,
Type=Error, Description=The type or namespace name `yyParser' could not
be found. Are you missing a using directive or an assembly
reference?(CS0246)
Any hints on how I can compile this?
Thanks in advance,
A
> Meaning, what language or runtime environment would my
> operating system consider first-class. I could choose C/C++, but that locks
> people into a language. Instead, I could choose IL, which can be generated
> by any number of languages.
This one's a pretty empty point. You wouldn't actually
I suppose the overhead shouldn't be enormous on unsafe ops - except
that the runtime is still consuming background resources and, as you
say, startup times are increased.
On 10/30/06, Johann MacDonagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Although there is a lot of overhead to start up a managed executa
Although there is a lot of overhead to start up a managed executable, I'm
sure unsafe pointer operations are just as fast as their C counterparts.
Martin Hinks wrote:
>
> It is indeed a very interesting concept
>
> Surely the main limiting factor will be that the runtime is never
> going t
It is indeed a very interesting concept
Surely the main limiting factor will be that the runtime is never
going to be as fast as unmanaged C for low level tasks such as
file/memory management...
Martin
On 10/30/06, jmacdonagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Glad to see I'm not the only one in
Glad to see I'm not the only one interested in ths. I've also toyed around
with this idea for some time. I began looking at traditional operating
system development to learn a little more.
I envision an operating system where applications and shared libraries are
first-class citizens. Meaning, th
IBM has offering for free remote access to Power5 hardware:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-openpower1/index.
html
So, this seems to be a solution for hardware access problem. The need
for spare time is still here. :(
I hope, this message does not breaks maillist rules, bu
On 10/26/06 Krishna Ganugapati wrote:
> I'm trying to compile Mono on 64 bit ppc SLES9 - I can build glib2,
> libgdiplus, but when I configure mono, I get the following error
>
> checking if inter-process shared handles are requested... yes
>
> configure: error: No JIT or interpreter support avai
On 10/26/06 Atsushi Eno wrote:
> Well, the point of the Ben's question is, compacting GC is likely to
> store array in nursery area (likely, since it could be regarded too
> big to store in nursery area), so nursery allocation and releasing
> might become faster than fixing string pointer which mig
The attached patch implements
1) DirectoryInfo.GetDirectories with SearchOption.AllDirectories
2) NameValueConfigurationCollection.Properties
this facilitates implementation of WWF configuration properties like:
http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.workflow.runtime.configura
Hello,
Are you using latest svn for vbnc? A few optimization was committed this
week so it should be faster. If it is running out of memory though I think
there might some other problem optimizations won't resolve.
Rolf
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:21:07 +0100, Kornél Pál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
40 matches
Mail list logo
