On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 13:48 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote:
> NUnit 2.4 is now keeping its settings in an XML file, rather than the
> registry. I've been using the ApplicationData
> special folder, which is defined to be writable by the current user.
>
> What I'm wondering is this: Is this currently w
Hi All,
NUnit 2.4 is now keeping its settings in an XML file, rather than the
registry. I've been using the ApplicationData
special folder, which is defined to be writable by the current user.
What I'm wondering is this: Is this currently working on most platforms? If
not, can anyone suggest a f
Hello,
There is another bug in SettingsPropertyValueTest class,
default value should be desirialized with serialize method
specified in the setting property
Please review the patch that fixes this bug.
Vladimir
SettingsPropertyValue.cs.patch
Description: SettingsPropertyValue.cs.patch
Setti
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 16:24 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > I think monodocer (or whoever has generated this file) should
> > ignore classes marked with the CompilerGenerated attribute.
>
> It seems like recent monodocer versions took care of this (or maybe it
> was an improved scope for the cla
Hello tim,
Try to compile your sources with the warning level 3 and not 4 that
should fix your issue.
Regards,
Marek
>
> I am trying to get a project to build and I keep turning up with:
>
> Unhandled Exception: System.NotSupportedException: The invoked member is not
> sup
> ported in a dynami
