Hi there
Just a short message to let those responsible know, that svn has not compiled
for about three days now.
make[8]: Entering directory `/home/compile/Compile/Mono/mcs/class/System.Data'
../../jay/jay -ct < ../../jay/skeleton.cs Mono.Data.SqlExpressions/Parser.jay
>Mono.Data.SqlExpressions
The following code runs correctly under .Net but produces an NRE under Mono
1.2.5 (both mcs and gmcs):
using System;
namespace Bug {
unsafe class Demo {
static void Foo(int[] data) {
fixed (int* data_ptr = data) { /* Do something */ }
}
public static void M
On 10/2/07, StApostol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following code runs correctly under .Net but produces an NRE under Mono
> 1.2.5 (both mcs and gmcs):
It's a mcs/gmcs bug. The csc compiled version executes fine on Mono
1.2.5, while the mcs compiled version fails with the same exception on
.ne
Filed as bug #330069 (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330069)
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Hey Cody,
> I just want to quickly point out that we have made numerous improvements
> to the look and functionality of gtk+ on Win32 during the 2.10-2.12
> cycle, and we are still working to further improve it. If there are any
> particular issues that are blockers for you in gtk+, please file b
Miguel,
> You guys are maintaining the Gtk# installer for Windows, right?
Yes -- I maintain the installer, and Cody does all the bug squashing
with gtk+ and win32. (Full Disclosure: We're both employed by
Medsphere)
> I wonder if we could merge the efforts?
Are you talking about merging effort
Hello,
> We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different
> interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the
> Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows.
Are the binaries for .NET and Mono any different, other than the GAC
install di
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 16:56 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different
> > interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the
> > Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows.
>
> Are the
Hey,
> > > We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different
> > > interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the
> > > Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows.
> >
> > Are the binaries for .NET and Mono any different, other than
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:42 -0700, Brad Taylor wrote:
> Miguel,
>
> > You guys are maintaining the Gtk# installer for Windows, right?
>
> Yes -- I maintain the installer, and Cody does all the bug squashing
> with gtk+ and win32. (Full Disclosure: We're both employed by
> Medsphere)
Ah, this is
[please CC me, I am subcribe to the list but I miss replies very fast]
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:14 +0200, "Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]"
wrote:
> We've also researched about the best portable I18N method, and we have
> discarded Mono.Posix until bug
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?
> Yes, I think this is possible, however it would force you guys to ship
> Mono in a separate installer.
I think we can do that; If we can do installers with dependencies (if
we move to MSI) then we can just have one that has everything, right?
> While we're chatting, if anyone is interested i
Hey Mirco,
> Ah, this is good to know who maintains that installer. I tried the 2.10
> installer once and ran into real problems and could not find the correct
> contact for it.
We're currently trying to track down some crashers we're seeing with
PerformQueuedUnrefs () in Gtk# 2.10.2 with TreeMod
> Regarding your feature request, of a fully managed gettext
> implementation for Mono, that would only work partly if you use glade,
> as glade will always use the unmanaged version.
We could always change that.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-de
Hello,
I'm trying to build a very minimal Mono (non-gui apps) for an embedded PPC
Linux system. I would like to cross compile it on my IA32 Fedora Core
system, which has the cross compiler tools located under /opt/Arabella. Are
there ./configure paramters that I can use to achieve this?
Thanks,
This evening I committed a patch to make Gnome.Keyring, the managed
Gnome keyring client implementation written by Gonzalo, installable to
the GAC.
The patch is based on what's already packaged by OpenSUSE, who have been
pushing the envelope to make this library fully installable. The Debian
g
> This is the last chance to make API-breaking changes or even obsoletions
> before we stabilize and make the release, so application authors and
> packagers should speak up as soon as possible if they are uncomfortable
> with any aspect of the library. At this stage, only critical changes
> w
17 matches
Mail list logo
