Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] WebMethods with SOAPAction = ""

2008-01-07 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi, Ok, I've applied your patch, with a new NUnit test case (it is possible to write a test for assuring WSDL contents by ServiceDescriptionReflector). Thanks. Atsushi Eno Arina Itkes wrote: > Hi, > > A wsdl file generated by a web service on IIS that has a method > with SOAPAction == ""

Re: [Mono-dev] Bug in handling of Datetime in Xml Serialization - testcase in msg

2008-01-07 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
mandag 07 Januar 2008 skrev Atsushi Eno: > Hello, > > I'll take a look, but it had better be filed as a bug on bugzilla so > that the issue can be tracked down and is safer in case I just forget: > http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs Surprisingly, my novell login appears to work. So, I have filed:

[Mono-dev] Building Tao.PhysFS documenation

2008-01-07 Thread Paul
Hi, I'm trying to build tao from the tarball on the mono-project website for inclusion in Fedora. I'm using mono-1.2.6 under Fedora 9 (rawhide). I am trying to build using nant and all goes well until it comes to building the Tao.PhysFS documentation where it hangs indefinately at the merging XML

Re: [Mono-dev] Performance of calls

2008-01-07 Thread Robert Jordan
Dax wrote: > Aefvadh, > >> The latter is by design, as methods of MBR classes are >> never inlined. > > Something like that I've assumed it to be.. But the questions on > differences between csc and gmcs and why static/virtual calls to MBR > classes are faster are still there.. Just perform the

Re: [Mono-dev] [Patch] NameObjectCollectionBase, HttpCookieCollection

2008-01-07 Thread Juraj Skripsky
Hi Miguel, You'll find the full patch attached. I've added some details to the ChangeLog entries and changed the author of the new units to Gert as he was the one who wrote them (hope he doesn't mind). - Juraj On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 21:23 +0100, Juraj Skripsky wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > Look again

Re: [Mono-dev] [Patch] NameObjectCollectionBase, HttpCookieCollection

2008-01-07 Thread Juraj Skripsky
Hi Miguel, Look again, they're there (as they were from day one), although they might lead to commit conflicts by now (I'll sort that out of course). My last mail with the patches attached was this: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2007-December/026250.html Is that an okay to com

Re: [Mono-dev] mono-basic license

2008-01-07 Thread Miguel de Icaza
> Can someone clarify the license for mono-basic? I've seen it as LGPLv2 > and GPL2 in different places! The compiler is LGPLv2.1 and the class libraries are MIT X11. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono.Addins in Monodoc

2008-01-07 Thread Miguel de Icaza
> I'm not sure this is a good idea because you will end up with two > paths to render the documentation: the GtkTextView and the Html > (because you will still maintain the web version). And I think the > GtkTextView approach is costly to develop and at the end you will not > get so much benefits

Re: [Mono-dev] Performance of calls

2008-01-07 Thread Dax
Aefvadh, > The latter is by design, as methods of MBR classes are > never inlined. Something like that I've assumed it to be.. But the questions on differences between csc and gmcs and why static/virtual calls to MBR classes are faster are still there.. bedah

Re: [Mono-dev] [Patch] NameObjectCollectionBase, HttpCookieCollection

2008-01-07 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hey, > Who's the maintainer of the classes in System.Collections.Specialized, > who can give me the okay to commit my changes (and Gert's unit tests) to > NameObjectCollectionBase[Test].cs? This looks fine, but it lacks ChangeLog entries. Miguel ___ Mo

Re: [Mono-dev] Performance of calls

2008-01-07 Thread Robert Jordan
Hi, Dax wrote: > some recent benchmarks have led me to something I find quite funny: > when deriving a class from MarshalByRefObject, static and virtual calls > are faster than "regular" calls using simple classes derived from > objects. The instance calls are, however, slower. The latter is by d

Re: [Mono-dev] Adding signal support to gapi genrated binding

2008-01-07 Thread Fabian Sturm
Hi! Thanks for the clarifications. Now I know that I can rest easy :-) The changes would probably be necessary in the gapi code generation, but for now I can disable them in the Makefile. Thanks a lot, Fabian Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 08:17 + schrieb Marek Safar: > Hello, > >> One unsolved

Re: [Mono-dev] [Patch] NameObjectCollectionBase, HttpCookieCollection

2008-01-07 Thread Juraj Skripsky
Hello again, Now that the holidays are over, my chances should be better: Who's the maintainer of the classes in System.Collections.Specialized, who can give me the okay to commit my changes (and Gert's unit tests) to NameObjectCollectionBase[Test].cs? - Juraj On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 19:50 +0100

Re: [Mono-dev] error while compiling Monodevelop

2008-01-07 Thread Paul
Hi, On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 23:28 +0530, Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui wrote: > Thanks. > > I monodevelop 0.17 installed from rawhide, it gives following error. You need gtk-sharp2 bit installed. TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! signature.asc Description: This

Re: [Mono-dev] error while compiling Monodevelop

2008-01-07 Thread Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui
Thanks. I monodevelop 0.17 installed from rawhide, it gives following error. ** (./MonoDevelop.exe:21182): WARNING **: Missing method Initialize in assembly /usr/lib64/monodevelop/bin/MonoDevelop.Ide.dll, type Gnome.Vfs.Vfs System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'gnome-v

Re: [Mono-dev] set culture uses serialization?

2008-01-07 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 01/06/08 Robert Jordan wrote: > Robert Jordan wrote: > > Since the current handling of CurrentThread.CultureInfo > > isn't quite perfect (changes of CurrentThread.CultureInfo's > > object state isn't reflected back into another app domains, > > like on MS.NET), I wonder why we don't use a more e

Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Simplifying/optimizing CodeGenerator.cs

2008-01-07 Thread Juraj Skripsky
Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for sketching out what you had in mind! That's a nice and clean design. I will definitely follow that pattern. - Juraj On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 13:26 +0100, Robert Jordan wrote: > Hi Juray, > > Juraj Skripsky wrote: > > Adding a abstract method to CodeObject, e.g. > > > >

Re: [Mono-dev] Error in tests in current SVN?

2008-01-07 Thread Jonathan Chambers
Hello, The easiest way to check if you have a local build error, or if there is a problem in svn is to look at the buildbot status: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild And it look like that test fails on the buildbot, so it's not your local setup. Thanks, Jonathan On Jan 7, 2008 2:06 AM, Mads

Re: [Mono-dev] Bug in handling of Datetime in Xml Serialization - testcase in msg

2008-01-07 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hello, I'll take a look, but it had better be filed as a bug on bugzilla so that the issue can be tracked down and is safer in case I just forget: http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs Atsushi Eno Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote: > Hi there > > I have a difference between output in current Mono SVN and

Re: [Mono-dev] error while compiling Monodevelop

2008-01-07 Thread Paul
Hi, > This error usually means that you don't have the -devel packages of mono > installed. They are required to compile MD. Not in this case > > configure: error: Please install mono version 1.1.10 or later to > > install MonoDevelop. I would suggest that the OP installs mono-1.2.6 which i

Re: [Mono-dev] error while compiling Monodevelop

2008-01-07 Thread Lluis Sanchez
Hi, This error usually means that you don't have the -devel packages of mono installed. They are required to compile MD. Lluis. El dg 16 de 12 del 2007 a les 22:36 +0530, en/na Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui va escriure: > error while compiling Monodevelop 1.0 beta 2 > > checking for pkg-config

[Mono-dev] Bug in handling of Datetime in Xml Serialization - testcase in msg

2008-01-07 Thread Mads Bondo Dydensborg
Hi there I have a difference between output in current Mono SVN and Windows 2.xxx. The following program construcs an object containing a date from an xml string, serializes and deserializes a couple of times. On Windows, the output remains stable, on Mono/Linux, my timezone appears to be subst

Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Simplifying/optimizing CodeGenerator.cs

2008-01-07 Thread Robert Jordan
Hi Juray, Juraj Skripsky wrote: > Adding a abstract method to CodeObject, e.g. > > abstract void GenerateCode(CodeGenerator generator); > > and implementing/overriding it in each subclass (where it calls the > appropriate CodeGenerator.GenerateXYZ mehtod) would indeed result in > nicer and faste

[Mono-dev] mono-basic license

2008-01-07 Thread Paul
Hi, Can someone clarify the license for mono-basic? I've seen it as LGPLv2 and GPL2 in different places! TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Mono-dev

[Mono-dev] Method not found: 'System.Diagnostics.Process.get_SessionId'

2008-01-07 Thread Arnhoffer Károly
Hi, I use today's RPM version of Mono on SuSE 9.3 (RPMs for Novell Linux Desktop 9 x86). My application is compiled with MS VisualStudio 2005. I would like to use System.Diagnostics.Process.SessionId in my application which method is presented in the documentation (documentation for that

Re: [Mono-dev] shadow copy problem

2008-01-07 Thread Marek Habersack
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:14:53 +0200, Anton Andreev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled: > Hi, Hey, > I have this problem now with XSP: > > > //Failed to create shadow copy (CopyFile).// > > > Any ideas what I should do next? A small test case triggerring the problem would be great - please atta

Re: [Mono-dev] [Patch] System.Web - validators

2008-01-07 Thread Marek Habersack
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 01:06:04 -0800, "Igor Zelmanovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled: > Hi there, Hey Igor, > Attached is the patch makes validators work within UpdatePanel. > > It introduce new internal interface IScriptManager. > If page contents instance of IScriptManager, validators call it's

Re: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r92329 -trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.Util]

2008-01-07 Thread Konstantin Triger
Hey Eno, Well, this is the area where I don't have enough knowledge to make a decision and prefer 'not to touch' (by leaving the decision to owners). If you are positive that RuntimeEnvironment.SystemConfigurationFile will be correct there for mono too, please commit. Regards, Konstantin Trige

Re: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r92329 -trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.Util]

2008-01-07 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hey Kosta, Well, I should have exactly indicated what I saw problematic. It is not about why you guys introduced TARGET_DOTNET (I guessed it is for such necessary case to differentiate .NET and mono runtimes), but about why you guys needed to avoid RuntimeEnvironment.SystemConfigurationFile in mon

Re: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: [Mono-patches] r92329 -trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.Util]

2008-01-07 Thread Konstantin Triger
Hey Eno, I did not completely understand your comment, but let me explain the background, so you will understand what Igor meant by this patch. Usually we develop Web-related stuff in MS.Net environment, we take XSP, Sys.Web from mono trunk and all the rest from MS and run 'usual' console appl

Re: [Mono-dev] Adding signal support to gapi genrated binding

2008-01-07 Thread Marek Safar
Hello, >> One unsolved thing is that I now get a warning for every signal I added. >> Can this be ignored or is this the norm? >> >> mcs -pkg:gtk-sharp-2.0 -target:library -out:generated/abiword-sharp.dll >> generated/*.cs >> generated/AbiWidget.cs(222,37): warning CS0169: The private method >> `Ab

Re: [Mono-dev] [SPAM] [PATCH] Simplifying/optimizing CodeGenerator.cs

2008-01-07 Thread Juraj Skripsky
Hi Andreas, You're right, the patch is over engineered. Robert pointed me to a much nicer solution which I will implement and post for review (hopefully in the coming days). - Juraj BTW: Was my mail tagged as spam by your local system/server? If so, could you send me the headers/spam-report in