In the class library I see a few pieces of code like the following. Am I
correct in thinking that code like this is bad?
info = Marshal.PtrToStructure (ptr, ...);
Marshal.FreeHGlobal (ptr);
// now we access the structure
int id = info.Id;
string name = Marshal.PtrToStringUni
Paul F. Johnson wrote:
I have an assembly which I need to strongly sign for inclusion into gac.
I have a .snk file but I'm unsure if I need to use sn or al2. By the
looks of it, it should be both, but I'm unsure on the syntax and msdn is
not helping!
You should need only to use sn.exe,
Andy Hume wrote:
In the class library I see a few pieces of code like the following. Am I
correct in thinking that code like this is bad?
Only if the .Name ptr is pointing to a memory block inside the
struct's area. So it depends on the specification of the
struct being marshaled.
info =
Hi,
To day MS has released sp1 of .net 3.5. which has Dynamic data,
Ado.net Entity set, some improvements in Linq to Sql are the new
features .
I have few questions
1. Is there any breaking changes in Core because Sp1 oerview says
Core improvements to the CLR.
2. What are the plan for this
I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is
that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This
makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to move from
olive to mono? Our will olive stabilize and get released? Do we need
to release a slimmed
Hi.
2. What are the plan for this features ?
My guess - for Dynamic data and Entity set we need Linq to Sql first
Regards this point just to say that we are currently working on it:
http://code.google.com/p/dblinq2007/ . DbLinq project mimics Linq2Sql, such
project has got two building
Revision 110267 breaks the build for me on x86_64, or wherever
MONO_ARCH_SIGSEGV_ON_ALTSTACK is defined. Is maybe the attached patch
what was intended? Or should the #ifdef around the first jit_tls
declaration be removed?
Thanks.
Index: mono/mini/mini.c
Hello,
Sharique uddin Ahmed Farooqui wrote:
Hi,
To day MS has released sp1 of .net 3.5. which has Dynamic data,
Ado.net Entity set, some improvements in Linq to Sql are the new
features .
Where did you find some improvements in Linq to Sql ?
I thought it is discontinued, but I might be
Hello all,
I'm in the initial stages of embedding Mono into my application. I
have a C struct like so (simplified):
typedef struct
{
float origin[3];
const char *name;
} gentity_t;
I would like to be able to pass a pointer to an object of this type
(allocated globally on the
Stephen,
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:42 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is
that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This
makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to move from
olive to mono? Our
Stephen,
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:42 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is
that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This
makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to move from
olive to mono? Our
Hello,
Geoff Norton wrote:
Stephen,
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:42 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is
that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This
makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to
For reference, we have somewhat similar things: System.Management.dll,
System.EnterpriseServices.dll and System.Messaging.dll.
Atsushi Eno
The problem here is that the dependency WindowsBase.dll has never
been worked on (actually I'm even unsure what kind of
work this dll needs) and hence
For reference, we have somewhat similar things: System.Management.dll,
System.EnterpriseServices.dll and System.Messaging.dll.
Atsushi Eno
The problem here is that the dependency WindowsBase.dll has never
been worked on (actually I'm even unsure what kind of
work this dll needs) and hence
14 matches
Mail list logo
