Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Paul
Hi, So Fedora doesn't do noarch packages? No, we do have noarch packages. Non-architecture specific things (like fonts and config scripts) go in them. What Geoff was getting at is bi-arch installations. In Debian and in openSUSE we can install both architectures at once. Packages that

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Paul
Hi, I will try to take up this particular part of the discussion over in Fedora land. Something needs to be done better here but we need buy-in from Fedora or we will just piss them off. This list is not the place for a dispute with Fedora. I totally agree, however this really isn't a

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Paul
Hi, For Fedora/RedHat users, the rule for 64 bit users is that code goes in /usr/lib64 rather than /usr/lib. Mono has quite a few packages which proports to move code to the correct libdir, but has things hardcoded as $(prefix)/lib rather than $(libdir) within config (and even source)

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 2.0 RC2 Delayed

2008-09-16 Thread Andy Hume
Don't know whether you're already aware of these which affect 2.0... Unfixed: .. 413636, WinForms, Crash on pressing an access-key Fixed, not backported: .. 414146, WinForms, WebBrowser UriFormatException crash in basic usage I'm about to go and try to test that fix here. Already fixed and

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Paul
Hi, So what happens if I install 32-bit and 64-bit mono on a 64-bit box, I get 2 of every .dll? No. When you update via yum, the correct package is installed for your architecture. If you then decide to use a non-Fedora RPM, then that's when things go potty and you get 2 of every

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Paul
Hi, There is a good reason. A very good reason. It makes the MD development independent of the mono development. Also, this particular complaint is rather out of date. MD has built Cecil from bundled sources since *last October* (I replaced most of our bundled binaries to make things

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 2.0 RC2 Delayed

2008-09-16 Thread Zoltan Varga
Hi, Not backported, but affects a new feature, thus not a regression?. .. 421098, Can't use --debug=casts with WinForms (etc?) We will look into putting this into 2.0.1. Zoltan ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

[Mono-dev] Class status pages are empty

2008-09-16 Thread Leszek Ciesielski
Hi, class status pages linked from http://www.mono-project.com/Class_Status are all empty, did something break? ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there, I think we can commit to keep builds for - Solaris x86 - Solaris SPARC - Mac PPC (And hopefully soon HP-UX, but not yet). But, we'd need some help starting up since I expect some problems building in Solaris. pablo www.plasticscm.com Andrew Jorgensen escribió: The Mono Team

[Mono-dev] Mono SVN Module is broken/imcomplete

2008-09-16 Thread Petit Eric
config.status: executing default commands mcs source:$(top_srcdir)/../mcs olive source: GC: included TLS: __thread SIGALTSTACK: yes Engine: Building and using the JIT 2.0 Beta:yes 2.1 Alpha: yes

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
We'll build for Mac OS X on PPC and x86 still but we would appreciate help with Solaris. What I'm trying to do for solaris is start maintaining the packages on Blastwave.org. They have a build infrastructure and lots of packagers to help us with packaging and build difficulties. Go to

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono SVN Module is broken/imcomplete

2008-09-16 Thread Petit Eric
2008/9/16 Petit Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]: config.status: executing default commands mcs source:$(top_srcdir)/../mcs olive source: GC: included TLS: __thread SIGALTSTACK: yes Engine: Building and using the JIT 2.0

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread pablosantosl...@terra.es
Ok, signed up at blastwave. Andrew Jorgensen escribió: We'll build for Mac OS X on PPC and x86 still but we would appreciate help with Solaris. What I'm trying to do for solaris is start maintaining the packages on Blastwave.org. They have a build infrastructure and lots of packagers to

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono support on Fedora, Ubuntu, Solaris, etc.

2008-09-16 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
A new mailing list has been created for mono packagers: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-packagers-list Hopefully we can use this to coordinate our efforts better and discuss issues we face as packagers. If you maintain (or will soon maintain) a downstream package of mono please

Re: [Mono-dev] Are these bugs/features going to be fixed/released in the next builds?

2008-09-16 Thread marcos b
Any news regarding these issues? marcos b wrote: Thanks Robert. The bug that you mentioned is about serialization of common DataSets. Which, at least in my tests, worked correctly (I cannot reproduce the bug). Please let me know if there are issues pending in this regard. My problem is

[Mono-dev] Clean/errase last make get-monolite-latest

2008-09-16 Thread Petit Eric
Hi When compiling last mon version from SVN, i did the mistake to do make uninstall so after i did make get-monolite-latest, no if i just want to use svn up and my local gmcs i need to delete what, because i think it continues to use bootstrap ? -- Cordially. Small Eric Quotations of the