Hi,
Please review and approve the patch. Thanks.
Kornél
Index: mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs
===
--- mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs (revision 118898)
+++ mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs (working copy)
@@ -681,10
I'm not sure whether this counts as a bug in mono, a bug in .NET or simply an
incompatibility that is acceptable, as it's probably a programming bug on my
part anyway.
Using the SoapFormatter, I output a serializable struct to a pre-opened
FileStream. I then output a second serializable struct
Hi Alan,
There a couple of issues with your code, let me get on them:
-Until recently (last night), getters were not accelerated, which causes a
significant
slowdown. I fixed this in r118899. The generated code is not as good as it
could be,
but this will be fixed eventually.
-Setters are still
Hi,
Sixes wrote:
The difference occurs on Deserialize. .NET reads the first envelope and
leaves the stream pointer at the end of the xml. Mono tries to read to the
end of the file and complains about two root elements. I'm not sure which
is correct behaviour.
IIRC, MS.NET 1.1
I don't have commit access; feel free to check it in when you have a chance.
~Brian
On Nov 14, 2008 6:35pm, Chris Toshok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awesome - you have commit access? If so, go for it. Otherwise I can get
this in tonight.
chris
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Brian O'Keefe
Robert Jordan wrote:
IIRC, MS.NET 1.1 SoapFormatter used to behaves like this.
So it's possible that Mono's SoapFormatter was not updated
to match MS.NET 2.0.
Please file a bug with a test case.
But that was my point and why I didn't file a bug report at once.
IMHO, mono is
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 12:32 +0100, Kornél Pál wrote:
Hi,
Please review and approve the patch. Thanks.
Go ahead and commit.
Thanks.
-Gonzalo
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Am 15.11.2008 um 12:32 schrieb Kornél Pál:
Index: mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs
===
--- mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs(revision 118898)
+++ mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs(working copy)
@@ -681,10
Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 15.11.2008 um 12:32 schrieb Kornél Pál:
Index: mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs
===
--- mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs(revision 118898)
+++ mcs/class/corlib/System/Convert.cs(working
Hi,
Please review the attched patch. Note that I've added svn:eol-style
native to all the files I've modified and source and project files thus
would be included entirely in the diff file so I excluded them but the
only addition would be adding StringsTest.vb.
Kornél
Index:
IMO it is not time to do it yet because we are rather stuck in too
separate build revisions to track regressions i.e. improving quality of
monobuild is in higher precedence. Having those standalone tests
in those builds makes current situation worse.
Atsushi Eno
Gert Driesen wrote:
Hi,
To
Hey,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan,
-Getters and setter are a hint of ill vectorized code.
In this particular scenario, I'm not sure how i can get rid of the use
of getters/setters unless I use even more unsafe code. I don't know
whether it's
Here's my benchmarking file anyway, it may prove useful.
Alan.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Alan McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan,
-Getters and setter are a hint of ill vectorized code.
In this
13 matches
Mail list logo
