Thanks, applied the patch.
Atsushi Eno
On 2009/11/26 8:13, Tom Philpot wrote:
> Here's a patch for Atom10ItemFormatter and Atom10FeedFormatter which writes
> ElementExtensions for the Feed and Item.
>
> This patch is MIT/X11 licenesed and brought to you by Martin Potter.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> ___
Hello,
> I have a slightly annoying compiler bug that has been sitting on
> bugzilla (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360455) for over
> a year without any activity. Could anyone please look into it?
>
I'll look into this issue.
Marek
___
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Mike Kestner wrote:
> I don't know how ugly it is. It would be extremely unusual to create a
> toplevel window without setting the title of the window, which is one
> available overloads. I'm not opposed to adding default constructors for
> everything. It would
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 19:27 +0100, Claus Jørgensen wrote:
> I made a example of what I think could be nice to have here:
> http://windcapes.pastebin.com/m7f2f591b , but I'm wondering if there
> is there a reason for them not being there, seeing that a number of
> other properties are available, bu
I think this patch as well got lost in the shuffle of a long U.S. holiday
weekend as well. Could someone please review and provide some feedback?
Thanks,
Tom
-- Forwarded Message
From: Tom Philpot
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:13:03 -0800
To: "mono-devel-l...@ximian.com"
Subject: [Mono-dev] Pat
Has anyone had a chance to review this patch for Mac OS X?
Basically, enumerating processes on Mac OS X doesn't work correctly in Mono
without this patch, but also doesn't always crash because we're malloc'ing
some large random number of bytes pulled from a garbage location in memory.
If that numb
Miguel de Icaza-2 wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> This week at the PDC we learned an important bit: that the Worfklow
> Foundation 4 is a simplified, much smaller and much simpler version of
> Workflow Foundation.
>
> When talking to the WF team, they seemed to think that we could
> reimp
