Re: [Mono-dev] Patch for Atom10{Item, Feed}Formatter for writing element extensions

2009-11-30 Thread Atsushi Eno
Thanks, applied the patch. Atsushi Eno On 2009/11/26 8:13, Tom Philpot wrote: > Here's a patch for Atom10ItemFormatter and Atom10FeedFormatter which writes > ElementExtensions for the Feed and Item. > > This patch is MIT/X11 licenesed and brought to you by Martin Potter. > > Tom > > > > > ___

Re: [Mono-dev] CS0067 with valid code

2009-11-30 Thread Marek Safar
Hello, > I have a slightly annoying compiler bug that has been sitting on > bugzilla (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360455) for over > a year without any activity. Could anyone please look into it? > I'll look into this issue. Marek ___

Re: [Mono-dev] Some questions in regards to the GTK# API

2009-11-30 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Mike Kestner wrote: > I don't know how ugly it is.  It would be extremely unusual to create a > toplevel window without setting the title of the window, which is one > available overloads.  I'm not opposed to adding default constructors for > everything.  It would

Re: [Mono-dev] Some questions in regards to the GTK# API

2009-11-30 Thread Mike Kestner
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 19:27 +0100, Claus Jørgensen wrote: > I made a example of what I think could be nice to have here: > http://windcapes.pastebin.com/m7f2f591b , but I'm wondering if there > is there a reason for them not being there, seeing that a number of > other properties are available, bu

Re: [Mono-dev] Patch for Atom10{Item, Feed}Formatter for writing element extensions

2009-11-30 Thread Tom Philpot
I think this patch as well got lost in the shuffle of a long U.S. holiday weekend as well. Could someone please review and provide some feedback? Thanks, Tom -- Forwarded Message From: Tom Philpot Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:13:03 -0800 To: "mono-devel-l...@ximian.com" Subject: [Mono-dev] Pat

[Mono-dev] FW: Patch for Processes.c on Mac OSX

2009-11-30 Thread Tom Philpot
Has anyone had a chance to review this patch for Mac OS X? Basically, enumerating processes on Mac OS X doesn't work correctly in Mono without this patch, but also doesn't always crash because we're malloc'ing some large random number of bytes pulled from a garbage location in memory. If that numb

Re: [Mono-dev] workflow foundation 4

2009-11-30 Thread SuperCiccio
Miguel de Icaza-2 wrote: > > Hello folks, > > This week at the PDC we learned an important bit: that the Worfklow > Foundation 4 is a simplified, much smaller and much simpler version of > Workflow Foundation. > > When talking to the WF team, they seemed to think that we could > reimp