Hello,
> 1) Is the LLVM back-end intended to be a long term solution to code
> optimization for performance sensitive code in mono?
So far it looks very promising, and if things continue to evolve nicely in this
direction, it would make sense.
> 3) Would success with the LLVM back-end necessari
Hey,
1) Is the LLVM back-end intended to be a long term solution to code
> optimization for performance sensitive code in mono?
>
> 2) How confident are you that the issues described can be resolved without
> kludge?
>
> 3) Would success with the LLVM back-end necessarily curtail efforts to
> impr
I have compiled mono with the LLVM back-end and run some tests.
Clearly there remains work to be done, but there were some cases where I
obtained executions speeds equal to an equivalent optimized C version. This
is really exciting for someone like me.
It is my belief / understanding that mono's
