The attached patch is a fix for System.Web.Security.Roles.IsUserInRole to
prevent ASP.NET MVC errors like the one shown at the bottom, which happens
when a user hasn't logged on and requests public pages with sections that
are dynamically removed using role-based access-restrictions. It now
behave
Hi, Tiaan.
It seems to me you'd want to use 'string.IsNullOrEmpty(username)'
instead of '(username != null && username.Length <= 0)'
Eyal.
-Original Message-
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com
[mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Tiaan
Geldenhuys
Sen
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:16:33 -0600
"Tiaan Geldenhuys" wrote:
Hello,
> The attached patch is a fix for System.Web.Security.Roles.IsUserInRole to
> prevent ASP.NET MVC errors like the one shown at the bottom, which happens
> when a user hasn't logged on and requests public pages with sections that
Actually, this should not be changed; that expression reads "is not null BUT
ONLY empty" as it was intended. The case for null is supposed to throw an
ArgumentNullException, which should happen when the RoleProvider is called
(if the provider is implemented according to spec) or a check for null c
Hi,
I'm embedding mono into a C++ application. Getting mono embedded and
loading assemblies has gone pretty smoothly, and now I would like to connect
the managed code to a debugger. If it matters, I'm doing my development on
Windows, but will eventually be running on Linux as well.
I've played
Hi Marek:
Thanks for committing almost all the changes, especially the ones to
WebTest. However, I would still like to get some ideas about a better way
to then isolate the Web.config settings between different Tests and Test
Fixtures -- because that seems to be the main issue with the changes th
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:58:53 -0600
"Tiaan Geldenhuys" wrote:
> Hi Marek:
Hey,
>
> Thanks for committing almost all the changes, especially the ones to
> WebTest. However, I would still like to get some ideas about a better way
> to then isolate the Web.config settings between different Tests a
The way to handle those situations is to have a arch decomposition pass that
converts MULPS into a VZERO + MULADD.
For bonus points, you can add to the arch peephole code to fuse MULPS +
ADDPS.
For an example of that, take a look at mini-x86.c /
mono_arch_decompose_opts.
Rodrigo
On Tue, Feb 9, 2
Hey,
The main reason why I didn't actually do any work on this at the time is
that it would probably take 1 man month to do the rewrite, pass the existing
tests and write more tests for the new behaviours and I didn't have a month
free to do it ;) Proper support for the new parser API is required
Hi Eberhard,
I'll take the time to review your patch tomorrow.
Changes to reflection code require a lot of testing since they can break a
lot of stuff.
Thanks,
Rodrigo
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Eberhard Beilharz wrote:
> Bump!
>
>
> On 01/28/2010 03:13 PM, Eberhard Beilharz wrote:
>
>
This patch is for System.Collections.Generic.HashSet to fix the error
shows at the bottom, which happens when you create a hash-set with a
non-default comparer like StringComparer.Ordinal and then attempt to
populate it with a null value. The hash-set should always be able to store
null values (fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
