Mono 2.8 is not for anytime soon. Miguel recently said it'd be released a
couple of months after .NET 4.0 is out.
paul-2-3 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> With the upcoming release of Mono 2.8 we are dropping the 1.0 profile
>> as developers moved a long time ago to the generics-based 2.0 profile
>> and b
Hi,
> With the upcoming release of Mono 2.8 we are dropping the 1.0 profile
> as developers moved a long time ago to the generics-based 2.0 profile
> and because it is maintenance burden for us.
Is there a date for this? Last I saw from Andrew was another spin on the
2.6 branch...
TTFN
Paul
--
With the upcoming release of Mono 2.8 we are dropping the 1.0 profile as
developers moved a long time ago to the generics-based 2.0 profile and
because it is maintenance burden for us.
In addition to this, I would like to stop distributing some libraries that
were either never completed and are no
Hi,
On 2010/02/28 1:42, Sander Rijken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on getting the configuration of
> System.ServiceModel.Web up to speed, after finding out that it wasn't
> working at all when I needed it in a project. I have some question now
> that I'm trying to include test code, and t
>
> Mono currently implements a shared handle mechanism to support .net
> applications which share handles between processes, a
> windows feature. This requires sharing state between mono processes, which
> is very problematic, so I would suggest making it opt in mono 2.8, i.e.
> introduce a MONO
Mono 2.6.1
Calling a method to return a SortedDictionary across an AppDomain causes
following exception. And sure enough, RBTree is not marked [Serializable].
Regards
Peter
System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException: Type System.Collections.Gen
eric.RBTree is not marked as Serializab
Hi,
ChangeLog:
Don't make compiler generated classes sealed by default.
Emit and close top level compiler generated classes as well.
ReferenceEquality comparer: Use RuntimeHelpers.GetHashCode that is the
default GetHashCode implementation based. (Also note that some SRE
classes haven no suppor