Thanks for the test, it cleared some things up :)
So - first, I cannot apply your HttpRequestChannel change. The code you
removed was introduced to fix real problem regarding HTTP 4xx; when
HTTP 4xx is returned, the response stream is inaccessible and the channel
should not try to read it.
Instea
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Paolo Molaro wrote:
> One solution is to introduce a function similar to
> GC_call_with_alloc_lock() in the Boehm GC, so that the unsafe table
> manipulation can be done without risk of interruption from the GC.
> Another one is to expose the critical region enter
Hey,
Attached is the initial patch that implemented guarded finally blocks. It
only works on unix/x86.
It solves the problem of Thread::Abort been delivered in the middle of a
handler blocks. The correct
behavior is to raise the exception right after the handler finishes. This
applies to catch, f
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Richard Kiene wrote:
> I've attached a patch which I release under the MIT/X11 license.
Thanks for the patch!
--
Jb Evain
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.xi
Well by definition a stable sort preserves the order of the collection for
equal elements, but I get what you're saying. After reading what you've said,
it would appear that what needs to happen is second_index - first_index in the
case of descending and first_index - second_index in the case o
Yes, its a trivial patch, but it Mono.GetOptions is removed from trunk
so allowing gnome-sharp samples to build with the newer Mono.Options
seems like a good idea.
--
Jay
Index: sample/gnomevfs/Mono.Options.cs
===
--- sample/gnomevfs/
> It would appear that the Compare method in SortSequenceContext.cs (lines 58 -
> 70 revision 152310) does not allow for equality.
>
> If a comparison returns zero on line 60 and a non-zero child context
> comparison is never found then Compare will return first_index - second_index
> on line
Looking at the patch, it's done within a "#if NET_2_0" compilation condition.
Shouldn't the same fix be applied in the "#else" just below (ie: replace
"null" with "CultureInfo.InvariantCulture")?
Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
>
> Fixed on HEAD (r154135), 2-6 (r154136) and 2-4 (r154137)
> Thanks!
> S
Fixed on HEAD (r154135), 2-6 (r154136) and 2-4 (r154137)
Thanks!
Sebastien
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 11:26 +0200, yoni shalom wrote:
> A crash occurs on windows machines when the process culture info
> doesn't support the string format representing the x509 certificate
> timestamp.
> Certificate time
The problem I was trying to fix was that it's possible for wait to be
set to null after:
if (wait != null)
and before:
wait.WaitOne(...)
causing a null reference exception.
Looking at MSDN it sounds like an AutoResetEvent should remain signalled
until a thread calls WaitOne? The problem is i
After examining the patch, I have applied some parts of your patch.
-wait = new AutoResetEvent (false);
-source.ListenerManager.GetHttpContextAsync (timeout,
HttpContextAcquired);
-if (wait != null) // in case callback is done before
WaitOne() here
Apologies for the wait- it's the time difference! :-)
I've come up with a test for the DestinationUnreachable patch. When I
was doing my testing I was using a combination of a .NET client and
manually firing in requests using PuTTY and examining the reply. When I
use a WCF Client in Mono the exc
On 03/24/10 Mark Probst wrote:
> The first patch make mono-ehash SGen-aware, the second implements
> CEE_MONO_TLS on Darwin/x86.
> --- a/mono/utils/mono-ehash.c
> +++ b/mono/utils/mono-ehash.c
[...]
> +#ifdef HAVE_SGEN_GC
> + if (type < 0 || type > MONO_HASH_KEY_VALUE_GC)
> + g_err
A crash occurs on windows machines when the process culture info doesn't
support the string format representing the x509 certificate timestamp.
Certificate timestamps should be parsed to DateTime using InvariantCulture,
which is what the patch does.
Stack Trace :
System.Security.Cryptography.Cryp
I have applied the patch almost as is (with some coding style changes),
with few exceptions:
- AddBaseAddress (new Uri (baseAddress.BaseAddress));
+ base_addresses.Add (new Uri (baseAddress.BaseAddress));
no need for this change.
Thanks a lot!
Atsushi Eno
On 2010/03/23 20:28, Matt Dargavel wr
15 matches
Mail list logo
