Hello Rodrigo,
Regarding your question unfortunately I cannot apply for GSoC due to time
and other constraints.
With your tips I managed to extend linear scan on to vector registers and
now SIMD code runs much faster. Thank you!
My next (:]) question is about "scalarization", i.e. running program
Hi Sergei,
I'm glad to hear about your improvements. Can you share the code?
I believe this is not the best approach. Mono.Simd was never intended to be
a variable width simd API. Making such proposition
makes coding over it significantly harder.
My suggestion is to implement both scalar replace
Please commit to trunk and branch-2-6 too.
Thanks
Index: io-layer/collection.c
===
--- io-layer/collection.c (revision 155314)
+++ io-layer/collection.c (working copy)
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
#ifdef HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_SETSTACK
I've just committed msbuild tasks and targets to support
building Silverlight projects with xbuild. Though the core of
the tasks is from monodevelop's moonlight code, there
are still enough differences that bugs would have creeped
in.
This could use lot of testing. As of now, this is available
on
It would be useful for Wine development if we had an easy way to run
the Mono testsuite on whichever CLI implementation happens to be set
up in Wine (Mono or MS .NET). To this end, I've made a small
proof-of-concept patch that adds a run-test-onwine target.
Note that I don't really understand most
Please do, Sergei I am also very much interested in the code.
Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
Hi Sergei,
I'm glad to hear about your improvements. Can you share the code?
I believe this is not the best approach. Mono.Simd was never intended
to be a variable width simd API. Making such proposition
mak
Hi,
Vincent Povirk writes:
> It would be useful for Wine development if we had an easy way to run
> the Mono testsuite on whichever CLI implementation happens to be set
> up in Wine (Mono or MS .NET). To this end, I've made a small
> proof-of-concept patch that adds a run-test-onwine target.
>
>
