[Mono-dev] certmgr patch to support password-protected pkcs file

2010-07-27 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hello, I wanted to import a password-protected pfx certificate, but it was not supported in our certmgr. So I have created a small patch to enable it. If it's looking good I'll push it in git (or feel free to do instead). Atsushi Eno diff --git a/mcs/tools/security/certmgr.cs

[Mono-dev] mono.security/certmgr patch to support TrustedPeople

2010-07-27 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hello again, This patch adds support for X509Store.TrustedPeople in Mono.Security and certmgr. Sorry for that this patch includes the previous change, I was lazy :| Atsushi Eno diff --git a/mcs/class/Mono.Security/Mono.Security.X509/X509Stores.cs

[Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Geoff Norton
Github takes the first line from the commit message to build this page: http://github.com/mono/mono/commits/master I think we should modify our current commit messages to not just be the change log entries, but have a 1 line summary of the patch first like this:

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Dale Ragan
+1 on the commit message change I'd also like to vote, along with work branches be in user's forks, to use this model: http://nvie.com/git-model -Dale Github takes the first line from the commit message to build this page: http://github.com/mono/mono/commits/master I think we should

Re: [Mono-dev] [Ximian-mono-list] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, Additionally, I think we should implement a policy that all work branches are made in user forks; and the only people who should be making branches in the mainline github are QA for release managment practices. I want to ask you a favor, can you please add to the document:

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Geoff Norton gnor...@novell.com wrote: Github takes the first line from the commit message to build this page: http://github.com/mono/mono/commits/master I think we should modify our current commit messages to not just be the change log entries, but have a 1

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Geoff Norton
On 2010-07-27, at 5:42 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: It doesn't make any sense to have work/feature branches on the central repository given we're using git. It's much easier and cleaner to simply have them on personal forks. One might not like dealing with extra remotes, but that would

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Probst
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera kump...@gmail.com wrote: I have another proposition to make. Can we stop using Changelog files? Those can be generated from the commit logs for tarballs and releases without losing anything at all. Commit messages would still have to be at least

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Mark Probst
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Dale Ragan dale.ra...@sinesignal.com wrote: +1 on the commit message change I'd also like to vote, along with work branches be in user's forks, to use this model: http://nvie.com/git-model One detail I really like about this is the non-fast-forwarding merge

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Alan
For commit messages, how about gnome style ones? http://live.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages We'll end up with messages like this: http://github.com/mono/moon/commit/feadf070d237c1227ff2709cf1d0131d267118e2:) Alan. On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Mark Probst mark.pro...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Geoff Norton
On 2010-07-27, at 6:27 PM, Mark Probst wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Dale Ragan dale.ra...@sinesignal.com wrote: +1 on the commit message change I'd also like to vote, along with work branches be in user's forks, to use this model: http://nvie.com/git-model One detail I

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Geoff Norton
On 2010-07-27, at 6:21 PM, Alan wrote: For commit messages, how about gnome style ones? http://live.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages This is actually very nice. My only concern is maintaining the list of [Tag]'s. -g We'll end up with messages like this:

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Marek Habersack
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:41:46 -0400 Geoff Norton gnor...@novell.com wrote: On 2010-07-27, at 6:21 PM, Alan wrote: For commit messages, how about gnome style ones? http://live.gnome.org/Git/CommitMessages This is actually very nice. My only concern is maintaining the list of

Re: [Mono-dev] github workflow proposals

2010-07-27 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Mark Probst mark.pro...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Dale Ragan dale.ra...@sinesignal.com wrote: +1 on the commit message change I'd also like to vote, along with work branches be in user's forks, to use this model:

[Mono-dev] The new world of Git -- what else can we change :-)

2010-07-27 Thread Raja R Harinath
Hi, I've been trying to think up some more ways to disrupt everyone's workflow, seeing that we've been so successful with the Git import ;-) But, these proposals aren't any of those. I actually have some ideas that I think are useful. These are in increasing order of intrusiveness, but are

Re: [Mono-dev] The new world of Git -- what else can we change :-)

2010-07-27 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Raja R Harinath harin...@hurrynot.org wrote: * clean up the main repos The source trees at github.com/mono/ have a lot of junk^W branches left over from the SVN days.  However, we mostly work on two or three main branches.  For instance, in the mono/ tree, we