Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Jordan
On 23.08.2010 04:53, Jerry Maine - KF5ADY wrote: > I found a discrepency in Mono.Simd.SimdRuntime.AccelMode and it is > equivalent access by reflection. I believe this is a bug. > > Attached is a test for this. I believe there are more cases of this in > Mono.Simd > > Any ideas on how to fix this?

Re: [Mono-dev] fixing some warnings - fatal error call might return

2010-08-23 Thread Alexander Stohr
Miguel de Icaza wrote on Fri Aug 6 17:24:41 EDT 2010: > Hello Alexander, > I like the patch, but it would be best if you included ChangeLog > entries that detail the changes. with a bit delay due to a PTO i've added the requested item and updated the patch to 001v2. regards, Alex. -- Neu: GMX D

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Jordan
On 23.08.2010 13:16, Robert Jordan wrote: > On 23.08.2010 04:53, Jerry Maine - KF5ADY wrote: >> I found a discrepency in Mono.Simd.SimdRuntime.AccelMode and it is >> equivalent access by reflection. I believe this is a bug. >> >> Attached is a test for this. I believe there are more cases of this i

[Mono-dev] mscorlib.dll not unloaded on windows

2010-08-23 Thread Ignas
I haven't attached a sample but test scenario is really simple. Init mono, create child app domain, load assembly, unload domain, cleanup mono, observe how mscorlib.dll is still loaded (at least on Windows). I can tell that by looking at Process Explorer utility which shows that mscorlib.dll is st

Re: [Mono-dev] mscorlib.dll not unloaded on windows

2010-08-23 Thread Kornél Pál
This is very strange since no more than a single mscorlib.dll should be loaded no matter how many AppDomians you have. Could you please send me more details about multiple mscolib.dlls: - are they loaded as DLLs or just file handles? - do they have exactly (string comparison, not considering ..,

[Mono-dev] daily builds broken?

2010-08-23 Thread Alexander Stohr
there seem to be no more daily builds there: http://mono.ximian.com/daily/ i put those zip files into my local bitbake build system and found the build to fail due to probably no longer responding to "make install". what has changed there in the recent two weeks? is it about configure/autoconf? r

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Jerry Maine
Would the c# portion of the patch work on MS .Net? ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Jordan
On 23.08.2010 19:24, Jerry Maine wrote: > Would the c# portion of the patch work on MS .Net? Dammit! I thought the icall would be ignored by MS.NET because I took care of not invoking it in this case. But icalls are not allowed in assemblies != mscorlib under MS.NET. Unless I'm misguided, the onl

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Rodrigo Kumpera
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Jordan wrote: > On 23.08.2010 19:24, Jerry Maine wrote: > > Would the c# portion of the patch work on MS .Net? > > Dammit! I thought the icall would be ignored by MS.NET because > I took care of not invoking it in this case. But icalls are not > allowed in

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Robert Jordan
On 23.08.2010 23:13, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > I think it's easier to catch the security exception under MS since its > accell mode is None anyway. > I had to move icall's call site outside the .cctor and mark the call site's method as non-inlineable to make this work. Thanks for the hint. http:

[Mono-dev] Cannot get UrlRewriter.net to work with Mono 2.6.7

2010-08-23 Thread Matthew Urbano
I'm trying to rewrite some URLs using Intelligencia.UrlRewriter.dll from UrlRewriter.net. I have added the reference to the dll, placed the dll in the site's bin folder, and added the following lines to my web.config I built the application and upload

Re: [Mono-dev] mono.simd

2010-08-23 Thread Jerry Maine
I have an alternate idea that I'd like to research. It may lead to a cleaner implementation. On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Robert Jordan wrote: > On 23.08.2010 23:13, Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > > > I think it's easier to catch the security exception under MS since its > > accell mode is None