Hi,
I might have a few small fixes/enhancements over Sys.Tx namespace, and I
would like to know who's the one I should sent the pull request on github??
Greets.
Pablo
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.
I have an ASP MVC2 application (running under mono 2.8 p1) which has an
async action (ValidateAsync) which handles user verification by consulting
an external subsystem (hence the async nature of the operation), after a
valid response it's received by the async completed method
(ValidateCompleted),
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Justin Malcolm wrote:
> Thank you for the reply Rodrigo,
>
> Do you mean that there is not much room for optimization of the output from
> 'mcs' or just of CIL in general? I have heard that the Microsoft C++
> compiler output better code than the C# one did (at lea
Thank you for the reply Rodrigo,
Do you mean that there is not much room for optimization of the output from
'mcs' or just of CIL in general? I have heard that the Microsoft C++
compiler output better code than the C# one did (at least at some point) so
I assumed that CIL efficiency mattered.
I
Nothing happened on this front for two reasons.
First that nobody had the time for it. It's a major undertaking.
Second, not one is sure that it will yield any improvements at all. Given
CIL
is a quite high level format with some rigid structure requirements, there
isn't
much room for optimizatio
Am 01.10.2010 um 15:35 schrieb Dick Porter:
> diff --git a/mono/utils/mono-sigcontext.h b/mono/utils/mono-
> sigcontext.h
> index a794a28..0cd3bc5 100644
> --- a/mono/utils/mono-sigcontext.h
> +++ b/mono/utils/mono-sigcontext.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,16 @@
> #define UCONTEXT_REG_ESI(ctx) (((ucontex
I remember reading a very long while back that there might be a plan to
create a generic CIL optimizer. I understood this to mean CIL in and better
CIL out.
Did anything ever happen with this? Is there any code anywhere I can dig
up?
--
View this message in context:
http://mono.1490590.n4.nab
