Hello Robert,
thanks for your answer.
>> temp.c: In function `main':
>> temp.c:170: warning: implicit declaration of function `g_utf16_to_utf8'
>> Any ideas what is missing? (I'd guess a header with a valid definition
>> of g_utf16_to_utf8, but I was not able to figure out where to find it).
>
Hi Andreas,
> As you wrote: That 200Mb isn't memory! It is address space.
> And as you have about 17592186044416 Mb of address space available on a
> 64-bit system 200MB isn't much to worry about.
Yep, ok, there's a longer story behind: we worked close to the Mono team
figuring out several issues
> Well, the point of the email is the following: something I've found
> several times is a situation where GC.GetTotalMemory gives me something
> like, let's say, 40Mb, then VIRT is something like 200Mb and RES is
> 80Mb.
>
> Mark refreshed me that jitted and non-jitted code will be eating up
> mem
Hi all,
I could have titled it "where my mem has gone?" too :P
I've been talking to Mark Probst today regarding some issues and
questions related to general memory usage.
We've been testing sgen for months now and we're currently moving our
internal production server to Solaris/SPARC & Mono/sgen
Hi,
MIPS is still not a supported mono architecture, somebody from the
community needs to step up and fix it/maintain it.
Zoltan
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jo Shields wrote:
> I've tried to build/run Mono on MIPS, so we can add to the list of
> architectures supported i
I've tried to build/run Mono on MIPS, so we can add to the list of
architectures supported in Debian. Sadly, whilst Mono builds, the build
is bad and fails to build any of the classlib:
make[7]: Entering directory `/home/directhex/mono-2.8/mcs'
make[8]: Entering directory `/home/directhex/mono-2.8
Hello,
Thanks for the patch, I very much appreciate it. Though there were some
problems in your patch.
- your implementation had an assumptiopn that WebGetAttribute and
WebInvokeAttribute has non-null UriTemplate. They can indeed be null.
- Your change broke RejectTwoParametersW
Ralph Leckett (rleckett at gmail.com) wrote on Mon Oct 11 11:56:00 EDT 2010:
> The following is a better way:
>
> long size;
>
> size = bmi.biWidth;
> if (size > G_MAXINT32 / 4)
> goto error;
> size *= 4;
it does the comparison based upon the numbers length
Hi,
>>> Firstly, the 'reset --hard' is an absolute no-no for a checkout.
>>> Please use 'git checkout'. 'reset' modifies the branch metadata --
>>> checkout only modifies the working tree. 'reset --hard' is a
>>> too-convenient bludgeon that smashes your branch metadata and working
>>> tree with
