In terms of the "mono download", are you referring to a git clone? or the
source tarball?
In terms of clone, I'd say it's valid to be there, they may not change
often but it would be good to see the version history within that fork,
rather than having to compare across mono and the fork.
However,
Hello,
We have some test suites for the core that Microsoft has shared with us
under a Microsoft/Xamarin agreement, but they are for just a few pieces,
not the entire thing that is being open sourced.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Follow up.
>
> I am wondering if we
Follow up.
I am wondering if we should submodule the reference source, or just copy
the files?
The module wont be updated frequently, and it is making the Mono download a
lot longer than it needs to be.
Miguel
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Miguel de Icaza
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> As promise
The final version of Mono includes an entire SDK.
You really only need the "mono" binary, the configuration files (if any)
and the DLLs that you need to use. Which should be some 4 megs or so.
As for features to disable in the VM, you need to be careful, but the
configure command takes a set of
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:05 AM, techi eth wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
>
> I am very new to mono. I am looking forward to use this great platform over
> Linux on ARM target.
>
>
>
> I have following point to check before start.
>
> 1) 1) How can I achieve small footprint from mono. I have followed the
> On 21 Nov 2014, at 07:05, techi eth wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>
> I have following point to check before start.
>
> 1) 1) How can I achieve small footprint from mono. I have followed the
> below link but it produces install directory which is more than 100 MB with
> mono 3.10.0.
>
I know
