On 24/09/2014 10:34 am, Ben Carter wrote:
On 24/09/2014 02:22 am, Zoltan Varga wrote:
Hi,
Mono tries to allocate all its code into the lower 32 bit part of the
address space (see MAP_32BIT in mono-codeman.c). What platform is this ?
Ah, that might well explain it - this is on Windows
de to perform an equivalent limiting of the
allocated address ranges. This is starting to make sense now...
Thanks!
--
Ben Carter - b...@saillune.net
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/lis
is sound like a reasonable hypothesis? Or is there something
that I'm missing about how trampolines operate that means that offsets
of this nature shouldn't occur in the first place?
Thanks for any ideas or advice!
--
Ben Carter - b...@saillune.net
__
ction pointers
between PPC64 and PPC32, but by eye it looks right).
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be going wrong here,
or where I should look next to try and figure out the problem?
Many thanks in advance!
--
Ben Carter - b...@saillune.net
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
rmountable problems?
Any information on these or indeed advice on porting strategy in
general would be very gratefully received - many thanks in advance!
--
Ben Carter - b...@saillune.net
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian
