Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-patches] r142362 - in trunk/gtk-sharp: . glib

2009-09-21 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey, When explicitly calling Dispose(), Remove() and Source.Remove () are called. Both will acquire a lock to access the same table and attempt to remove the same ID... Thanks for catching this. Fixed in trunk r142364 and 2-12 branch r142365. Best, -Brad

[Mono-dev] Suspected breakage with references in mcs trunk

2009-09-16 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey, I updated mcs and mono to trunk today (r142066) and noticed that gtk-sharp (trunk and gtk-sharp-2-12 branch) as well as other applications like Tomboy no longer build. Here's a snippet of what I'm seeing: /home/brad/mono/bin/mcs /out:glade-viewer.exe /r:../glib/glib-sharp.dll

Re: [Mono-dev] Announcing Mono 2.4 Preview 2...

2009-02-06 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey Thomas, Please report any bugs that you may find using our Bugs page, AND reply to this thread with the bug numbers so we can track them: http://www.mono-project.com/Bugs Please add: Bug 473343 - [Regression] WebBrowser becomes unresponsive after Navigate (...) We just found it today.

Re: [Mono-dev] UIA Olive Reorganization at 1pm EDT

2008-11-17 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey, As far as I understand, you already have support for MWF, right? So far, we've implemented a portion of the UIA Provider specification (basically implementing UIA for MWF controls), and we've developed a Bridge between UIA and ATK, allowing GNOME Assistive Technologies to access a limited

[Mono-dev] UIA Olive Reorganization at 1pm EDT

2008-11-06 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey Folks, [Apologies for not using my Novell address -- I'm not subscribed to m-d-l there.] The Mono Accessibility team will be moving our assemblies (UIAutomation{Types, Provider, Client, Bridge}) from olive into our uia2atk module at 1pm EDT today in preparation for our upcoming v0.9 release.

Re: [Mono-dev] UIA Olive Reorganization at 1pm EDT

2008-11-06 Thread Brad Taylor
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 19:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is UI Automation working on Linux!! :-) We're working on it! Check out http://mono-project.com/Accessibility Best, -Brad ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono.Addins suppress console window showing

2008-07-03 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey Vlad, Recently I started using Mono.Addins in my application and it looks very good. But as the application is primary used under windows (should be working fine under Linux too) I get an annoying console window showing when I run: snip You can also compile Mono.Addins as a winexe target

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.9.0 Preview 3 is out - mono 1.9 pre3 / gtk# 2.10.3 not working on Win32

2008-02-26 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey, I'm not sure if there is a bug for this or not. The gtk# 2.10.3 that comes with the mono 1.9.0 preview 3 windows installer is broken. In particular, setting or getting a value from a tree model. Weird, we at Medsphere haven't had any issues with this installer when running

Re: [Mono-dev] Wapi handle leaks problems

2008-02-21 Thread Brad Taylor
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Hubert FONGARNAND wrote: Le mercredi 20 février 2008 à 20:43 +, Dick Porter a écrit : On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 09:51 +0100, Hubert FONGARNAND wrote: - don't you thing that a 4096 limit for WAPI handles is too small for big production servers? (on

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.9.0 Preview 1+ is out!!

2008-02-01 Thread Brad Taylor
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:40 -0700, Thomas Wiest wrote: Hey Everyone, We've just released Mono 1.9.0 Preview 1+ today! Please help us out by giving it a try with your applications. As always, you can get the preview releases here:

Re: [Mono-dev] Win32 Gtk# Installers (Was: Re: C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?))

2007-10-16 Thread Brad Taylor
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 10:46 -0500, Jerome Haltom wrote: I spent a lot of time previously researching all this MSI stuff. No, you can't do that. Merge modules might have been an answer, but merge modules are not designed for dependencies. They are designed to repackage files for a private

Re: [Mono-dev] Win32 Gtk# Installers (Was: Re: C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?))

2007-10-16 Thread Brad Taylor
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:51 -0500, Jerome Haltom wrote: You misunderstand how merge modules work. At this point, my knowledge about this whole MSI thing is just slightly above zero, and I've found the MS documentation to be incredibly lean on more complicated install practices, so you're most

Re: [Mono-dev] Win32 Gtk# Installers (Was: Re: C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?))

2007-10-16 Thread Brad Taylor
snip This is a subject I'd really like to talk about. I had created some MSI files for the Gtk stack which I never saw through to completion. During that process I came across some ideas and best practices I thought would really make them polished. Are you available on some sort of IRCish

Re: [Mono-dev] C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?)

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Taylor
Miguel, You guys are maintaining the Gtk# installer for Windows, right? Yes -- I maintain the installer, and Cody does all the bug squashing with gtk+ and win32. (Full Disclosure: We're both employed by Medsphere) I wonder if we could merge the efforts? Are you talking about merging efforts

Re: [Mono-dev] C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?)

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey, We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows. Are the binaries for .NET and Mono any different, other than the GAC

Re: [Mono-dev] C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?)

2007-10-02 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey Mirco, Ah, this is good to know who maintains that installer. I tried the 2.10 installer once and ran into real problems and could not find the correct contact for it. We're currently trying to track down some crashers we're seeing with PerformQueuedUnrefs () in Gtk# 2.10.2 with

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono summit, options.

2007-07-17 Thread Brad Taylor
Hey Miguel, snip Which probably means Do your conference in Boston, in mid February to guarantee attendance ;-). May I suggest scheduling the conference right after (or before) the GNOME Summit[1] in October? We might get higher attendance that way. Cheers, -Brad -- [1]