Hello,
Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
Hello,
It's worth mentioning one thing thou. I don't think it's very advisable for
you guys to spend time on the current MSIL assembler.
We're trying to get rid of PEAPI in favor of a Cecil based version. We just
haven't really got enough resources to do
Hello,
I just noticed that most vector types in Mono.Simd.dll have an operator*, but
not Vector16 and Vector2l.
What is the reason for that?
Thanks,
--
Erven.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hello,
I tried to build the preview 2.6 on Sparc and PowerPC. It failed on both,
apparently because of problems in GC, but for different reasons.
The problem on powerpc looks similar to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494026 in Mono-2.4.
I may well be missing something...
--
Hello,
I have a few questions about inlining:
- I am curious what the heuristics are. I looked at the function
mono_method_check_inlining, but even when the function returns TRUE, the
function might not be inlined. Could you point me the relevant piece of code?
Is
there any high level rule
Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
Hello,
Did the student of Google Summer Of Code release the code for what his
done so far with the GCC CLI project?
That project was not completed (that is a few years old)
But there are good news, the folks at ST Microelectronics maintain a CIL
branch in GCC.
Hello,
I recently added some initial support in our GCC CLI port to map GCC vector
types to Mono.Simd. Vector types, either hand written by the programmer or
generated by the auto-vectorizer should be mapped to the corresponding
Mono.Simd.Vector* types.
And I was wondering about the future
Hello,
Mono crashes (it seems in the register allocator) with code compiled from C, in
the presence of uninitialized locals.
Here is the bug report: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481559
--
Erven.
Thomas Wiest a écrit :
Hey Everyone,
We've just released Mono 2.4 RC 1 today!
Miguel de Icaza a écrit :
We use ilasm for C toolchain and we were planning to add a few features. Are
we better off waiting for new version?
Am sorry if this was confusing on the web page.
We are not looking to rewrite ilasm, we are only looking to change the
backend engine for it.
Hello,
A month ago I proposed a patch to ilasm to emit local variable information in
the mdb file. The bug (#368178) remained in the 'NEW' status.
In the mean time, I saw that one of the proposals for the GSoC is to rewrite
ilasm.
I was wondering if ilasm is still in active development? Or are
Hello,
I am part of the group at STMicroelectronics who is developing a GCC
backend for CLI (http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cli.html). At this point I
am trying to add debugging information to the .il file and to use ilasm
to produce the final exe/mdb files.
- I modified ILParser.jay and
10 matches
Mail list logo
