>I think Wade Berrier checked in a fix for this, and it should be
>available soon.
Isn't test builds done before new releases, other than on a developers PC or at
least more than one
PC? Standard product releasing procedures come to mind... :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
Hi,
What versions of Windows does Mono support. Of the bat, I would have thought
from Win2000 and
up, maybe NT 4 and up, due to Unicode support in Mono and .NET.
If Unicode is a requirement, then wouldn't the following
Microsoft Layer for Unicode on Windows 95, 98, and Me Systems, 1.1.3790.0
Hi Paolo,
I wasn't complaining, just merely stating my findings on my computer. I am new
to Mono and .NET
and am currently evaluating Mono for a future development project of ours. I
wanted to know if I
was maybe missing something in my setup of Mono, which could have caused the
slowdown.
Hi,
I came across a article on the net, that compares different languages and
there performance (Java, C#, C++, etc..). I thought I would try something
simular, but testing the execution speed of the .net runtimes for Microsoft
.NET 1.1 and Mono 1.1.8.3
I compiled the C# benchmark application
Attached is the code for the Benchmark.cs application...
Benchmarks.cs
Description: Binary data
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
If you mean the Benchmark.exe must be built with optimizations on, I have done
that. It runs a
little bit faster, and on some tests, actually slower, but still not nearly as
fast as with the
Microsoft .NET framework.
I installed Mono from the released builds, I don't compile Mono myself. I w
