part of your patch in svn trunk.
> I fixed WebHttpBindingElement.Properties to include those from base type in
> less changes instead of your entire rewrite. (And some coding convention
> fixes.)
>
> Atsushi Eno
>
>
>
> On 2010/03/01 20:50, Sander Rijken wrote:
>
Hi,
This patch fixes the issues I've found while attempting to use
webHttpBinding.
Changelog:
Move away from static ConfigurationProperty fields, to allow including the
ConfigurationProperties in base in the Properties getter.
Add testcases to verify configuration loading.
--
Sander R
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Atsushi Eno <
atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2010/02/28 1:42, Sander Rijken wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been working on getting the configuration of System.ServiceModel.Web
>> up to spee
7;re using 2.4 in other places, and
also without an nunit.framework project in the test solution. Is it ok to
get rid of the reference to the non-existing project, and update the sln /
csproj to use the nunit.framework dll? What is the location of the dll that
should b
