[Mono-dev] boo-devel packaging

2008-06-17 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I'm planning on making a package split for boo. This came about from banshee depending on boo, which has an assembly that depends on nant, thus pulling in lots of -devel packages. So I'll take Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll and put it in boo-devel. Debian does a split of .dlls and .exes. Should the

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono.lib on Windows

2008-05-30 Thread Wade Berrier
Wow, libmono.a is 64MB, 15 MB compressed... :( Um, maybe we could have a win32 embedded Wiki page that describes this rather than ship 2 files of that size in the installer? Ideas or recommendations? Wade On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 18:23 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: Just to be sure, this was using

[Mono-dev] 1.9.1 VMware and LiveCD

2008-04-23 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, The livecd and vmware images for 1.9.1 have been posted and are available from our download page: http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads Thanks to Thomas and Marek who got mouse and video integration working, as well as drag and drop. Enjoy! Wade

[Mono-dev] 1.9.1 Mono Release

2008-04-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, We've released 1.9.1 as a minor bugfix update to 1.9. The release notes are here: http://go-mono.com/archive/1.9.1/ and downloads are available here: http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads Thanks to all those who contributed to this release. Enjoy! Wade signature.asc Description: This

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.9.0 Preview 4 is out!!

2008-03-11 Thread Wade Berrier
Yeah, sorry about that. I think they had the wrong preview number on that page for a day or so before I fixed it. Wade On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 21:01 -0600, Thomas Wiest wrote: D Bera wrote: We've just released Mono 1.9.0 Preview 4 today! Please help us out by giving it a try with your

[Mono-dev] Mono embedding on win32

2008-02-29 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I've had some requests to ship a .lib file in the windows installer in order to embed the mono runtime on windows. I found this information: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg00667.html We're already shipping libmono.dll.a . (I do run strip --strip-unneeded on it, although I'm not

[Mono-dev] Snapshot builds

2008-02-28 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, As was posted in the news items, I am publishing hourly snapshot sources and rpms for some later suse distros. http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/snapshot/download-trunk/ The wiki has also been updated with this link: http://mono-project.com/Other_Downloads#Snapshots This may be convenient

[Mono-dev] Snapshot builds

2008-02-28 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, As was posted in the news items, I am publishing hourly snapshot sources and rpms for some later suse distros. http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/snapshot/download-trunk/ The wiki has also been updated with this link: http://mono-project.com/Other_Downloads#Snapshots This may be convenient

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.9.0 Preview 2 is out!!

2008-02-19 Thread Wade Berrier
We decided to leave Mono out of the path and instead have a command prompt that sets up the environment. Maybe it's a personal preference, but it also lets you have multiple versions of Mono installed. Maybe we should reconsider? Wade On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 14:52 +1100, Alistair Leslie-Hughes

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.9.0 Preview 2 is out!!

2008-02-19 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, The 1.9 preview 3 win32 installer will be built with innosetup 5.2.2. Thanks, Wade On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 10:41 +0100, Kornél Pál wrote: Hi, You are building the Windows installer using Inno Setup 5.1.5 that was released almost three years ago. Currently the latest release is 5.2.2

Re: [Mono-dev] win-4-i386 build hung

2007-10-18 Thread Wade Berrier
?platf orm=win-4-i386package=monoHEAD_or_RELEASE=HEAD BTW is the start time reported in UTC or +4? Andy -Original Message- From: Wade Berrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 October 2007 22:58 To: Andy Hume Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-dev

Re: [Mono-dev] win-4-i386 build hung

2007-10-16 Thread Wade Berrier
I restarted it today... Thanks! Wade On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 09:13 +0100, Andy Hume wrote: It's still hung! install-deps inprogress [ Running for 1682 min(s) ] Can it be killed? Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[Mono-dev] Class Status Pages

2007-10-16 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I generate class status pages in monobuild now instead of during the nightly daily build. Check out: http://www.mono-project.com/Template:StatusPages I'm pretty sure the description for olive needs to be updated... A cron job will run once a day and collect the latest status pages from

Re: [Mono-dev] Class Status Pages

2007-10-16 Thread Wade Berrier
I think the issue is that the masterinfos that I use on the olive module only has the 3.0 stuff. I think after they are updated, or after we have 2.1 masterinfos, they will have the silverlight assemblies. I'll look into it. Wade On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 22:57 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello

[Mono-dev] monobuild documentation on the wiki

2007-10-09 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I've updated some monobuild documentation on the wiki: http://www.mono-project.com/BuildSystem/MonoBuild Wade signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

[Mono-dev] Class Status pages for Olive

2007-10-05 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Status pages are generated for olive on monobuild. Here's the link (which is temporary for now because old builds get removed from mono.ximian.com): http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/builds/HEAD/suse-100-i586/olive/86908/files/steps/api-diff/ Miguel mentioned that there are some missing

Re: [Mono-dev] C bindings VS C++ bindings (Gtk# vs. Kimono?)

2007-10-02 Thread Wade Berrier
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 16:56 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello, We had discussed this about a year ago and decided that we had different interests, since we were focused on using MS .NET on Windows, and the Mono team wanted to (rightfully so) focus on Mono on Windows. Are the binaries

Re: [Mono-dev] Daily test tarballs no more ?

2007-09-12 Thread Wade Berrier
This was set back up... should have dailies tomorrow. Wade On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 19:42 +0200, Joachim Ante wrote: Hi, It seems the daily test tarballs are not being generated anymore. The last test tar ball was 21-08, last month. http://mono.ximian.com/daily/ I'd really appreciate if

[Mono-dev] Mono 1.2.5 Released and Published

2007-08-30 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Mono 1.2.5 has been released. Release notes are here: http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/ Downloads are available from: http://mono-project.com/Downloads There are also rpms in the openSUSE Build Service (which has RPMS for newer Fedora distros and suse factory):

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.2.5 Preview 2

2007-08-02 Thread Wade Berrier
installation methods (source and binary installer) in terms of the assembly versions in gac ? On 8/2/07, Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Mono 1.2.5 preview 2 sources, packages, and installers are available at: http

[Mono-dev] Mono 1.2.5 Preview 2

2007-08-01 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Mono 1.2.5 preview 2 sources, packages, and installers are available at: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ At some point, the release notes for 1.2.5 will be available at: http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/ If no critical bugs are found after the preview period,

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.2.5 Preview

2007-07-31 Thread Wade Berrier
Definitely. On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 16:56 +0900, Sanghyeon Seo wrote: 2007/7/28, Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mono 1.2.5 preview sources, packages, and installers are available at: This seems to cause IronPython 1.1 to segfault, which is a regression. Filed as a bug here: http

[Mono-dev] Mono 1.2.5 Preview

2007-07-28 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Mono 1.2.5 preview sources, packages, and installers are available at: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ At some point, the release notes for 1.2.5 will be available at: http://go-mono.com/archive/1.2.5/ If no critical bugs are found after the preview period,

Re: [Mono-dev] DeflateStream : bit length overflow

2007-07-09 Thread Wade Berrier
At the suggestion of Paolo, I ran: strings /usr/lib/libMonoPosixHelper.so |grep overflow against the file that shipped in the 1.2.3.1 rpm, with no results. Jonathan, could you try running this? Also, could there possibly be another libMonoPosixHelper.so that is getting called? Wade On Wed,

Re: [Mono-dev] DeflateStream : bit length overflow

2007-07-09 Thread Wade Berrier
I looked at the build logs, and DEBUG is not defined anywhere. (I also checked config.h) Here's the exact make output for trees.c: if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I..

Re: [Mono-dev] DeflateStream : bit length overflow

2007-07-09 Thread Wade Berrier
: Binary file /path/libMonoPosixHelper.so matches So it seems that this is the file that is being used. Is there a way to know for sure which .so file is actually used when running mono? Thanks, Jonathan -Message d'origine- De : Wade Berrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé

Re: [Mono-dev] Regression Tests Webpage

2007-07-05 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:34 -0700, Matt Jones wrote: Hi - I'm working on improving .net support under wine this summer as an intern at Google, and I stumbled upon the test suite webpage[1] on the website. I've tried downloading the scripts used to compile all the data, but the

Re: [Mono-dev] Call for testing: Mono 1.2.4 Preview Available

2007-04-25 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Preview 2 has been uploaded to this same location. mono/mcs was retagged as mono-1-2-4 from the mono-1-2-4 branch. Thanks to all who have taken a look at the preview releases. Wade On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 22:26 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, Mono 1.2.4 preview sources, packages

Re: [Mono-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Mono-list] New anonymous subversion hostname]

2007-04-19 Thread Wade Berrier
, Wade Berrier wrote: Notice to all using the anonymous subversion repository: svn.myrealbox.com has been renamed to anonsvn.mono-project.com Wade Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: [Mono-list] New anonymous subversion hostname Subject: Re: [Mono-list] New anonymous

[Mono-dev] [Fwd: Re: [Mono-list] New anonymous subversion hostname]

2007-04-11 Thread Wade Berrier
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:35 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 20:31 -0400, Joshua Tauberer wrote: Wade Berrier wrote: There is a simple way to migrate existing svn repositories to use the new hostname. Slightly simpler :) is to use: Haha, MUCH simpler, thanks

Re: [Mono-dev] monologue and RSS.NET.dll

2007-02-09 Thread Wade Berrier
Good idea. Patch attached. If no one objects, I'll commit. Wade On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 09:02 -0200, Rafael Teixeira wrote: I vote yes, but it would be nice to tag the error in the author's list to the right, as when the feed can't be read. :) On 2/8/07, Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mono-dev] [Ximian-mono-list] Feedback needed: Preview of release notes for Mono 1.2.3

2007-01-25 Thread Wade Berrier
This is the first release we're shipping IPCE instead of IronPython. Also, it might be worthwhile to mention the sparc speedups. Wade On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:02 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: As usual, the preview for the Mono 1.2.3 release is here:

Re: [Mono-dev] [Ximian-mono-list] Preparing for the 1.2.3 release: tree and release notes.

2007-01-23 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, There are currently several build failures. Neale is looking into the s390x failure. Macos is failing for both platforms; looks like shell related build failures which I'll look into. Solaris8 on sparc has been failing for some time, as well as debian on arm and sparc. Out of these, I

Re: [Mono-dev] Build is stuck?

2007-01-03 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I've 'unstuck' the arm build, although it is failing... Thanks, Wade On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:27 +0100, Thomas Strecker wrote: Hello, I'm not sure who to contact, so I'll try this way. The debian-31-arm build (http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/python/monobuild.py) is stuck for a long

Re: [Mono-dev] VMware Image Update - Mono 1.2.2.1 and openSUSE 10.2

2006-12-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Yes, although like Miguel says, sounds like they don't work, even though they are included. Wade On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 09:58 -0800, Daniel Morgan wrote: When you say default suse install, would this include open office.org 2.x with mono bindings? --- Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[Mono-dev] 1.2.2 Preview (Was: Re: Call for release notes in 1.2.2)

2006-12-01 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Preview sources, packages, and installers for 1.2.2 are located here: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ Enjoy! Wade On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 10:39 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello Jonathan, Wade, Also, if Wade has a Windows preview package, I can run some

[Mono-dev] 1.2.1 Preview Release

2006-11-18 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, 1.2.1 has been tagged and preview sources/packages/installers are posted here: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/preview/download-preview/ If no major issues are found, this release will be posted to mono-project.com next week. Mono doesn't currently build on solaris, thence the missing

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-13 Thread Wade Berrier
Raja has fixed the files that were causing the issues with 'make dist', so I've reverted back to using 'make dist' instead of 'make dist-zip'. Wade On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:06 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, Several have reported that the tarballs available from mono.ximian.com/daily

[Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Several have reported that the tarballs available from mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable. This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using. We must use this limited format to support some older distros. To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :( Wade On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 06:24 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote: Hi, I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at compression. How was the difference? Atsushi Eno Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, Several have reported

Re: [Mono-dev] 1.2 Release Candidate Sources / Call for Testing

2006-11-03 Thread Wade Berrier
I've posted packages and installers. Enjoy! http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/rc/download-rc/ Wade On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 19:44 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, The source tree has been tagged for 1.2. The release candidate tarballs are available here: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/rc

[Mono-dev] 1.2 Release Candidate Sources / Call for Testing

2006-11-02 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, The source tree has been tagged for 1.2. The release candidate tarballs are available here: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/rc/sources-rc/ I'll post some packages and repos later, as well as installers. Please try your apps, especially winform apps, and keep the bug reports rolling!

[Mono-dev] Class Status updates

2006-09-13 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I've recently finished adding the class status webpage generation to the same cron job that produces the dailies (monolite, monocharger, etc). I copied scripts and files from trunk/release/buildbot/scripts to trunk/release/scripts/class_status. mono-snapshot.sh, which produces the dailies,

Re: [Mono-dev] Packaging NAnt

2006-07-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 11:39 -0300, Rafael Teixeira wrote: Mono nowadays packs the .NET 1.1 libraries (Version=1.0.5000.0) that are compatible with the .NET 1.0 libraries (Version=1.0.3300.0). So adapt your script to add a rpm provides for each 1.1 library you pack. A better, but more

Re: [Mono-dev] Packaging NAnt

2006-07-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi Gert, On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 18:33 +0200, Gert Driesen wrote: I really appreciate the work you're doing, but wouldn't it be best if we (the NAnt team) would release the RPM's ? (same goes for NUnit, ...) I think that would be fine. I have an interest in posting and building rpms anyway,

Re: [Mono-dev] Packaging NAnt

2006-07-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 14:32 +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: To me this sounds like you try to package binaries, which is bad for different reasons. One reason you just found, you can't predict the references that will be used. If you compile nant correctly from source, you will have the

[Mono-dev] Packaging NAnt

2006-07-13 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, In trying to build and package nant, I've found that nant has some internal libraries that reference the 1.0 profile of .NET: berrier:/usr/src/packages/SPECS # rpm -i ../RPMS/noarch/nant-0.85_rc4-1.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: mono(System) = 1.0.3300.0 is needed by

Re: [Mono-dev] Preview of the release notes.

2006-06-30 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi, I've created the 10.1 jail for i586 yesterday, and will do x86_64 today. After I get buildbuddy installed and configured I can build some rpms. Wade On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:05 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello, A question: will this release be available in RPMs for SUSE 10.1?

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono on the x86 Intel Macs

2006-06-14 Thread Wade Berrier
The plan is to have one out the next couple of weeks. Wade On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:40 -0500, Colt D. Majkrzak wrote: Is there any projected time line on when an Intel Mono installer will be available for the Intel Mac’s? If not, are there any notes some where on how to properly build mono

Re: [Mono-dev] Win32 build is broken - r59306 - threads.c

2006-04-12 Thread Wade Berrier
This is also happening on macos. Wade On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:30 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote: Hi, The error I get: /.libs/libmonoruntime.a(threads.o): In function `mono_debugger_init_threads': /mono/mono/mono/metadata/threads.c:2902: undefined reference to `_gc_thread_vtable' Please

Re: [Mono-dev] MonoDevelop 0.10 in Mono 1.1.4 Linux Installer

2006-04-12 Thread Wade Berrier
1.1.14_1 does come with MD 0.10. 1.1.14_0 does not. The _release revision is only for linux installer updates. Wade On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 18:54 -0400, Daniel Morgan wrote: Does MonoDevelop 0.10 come in the latest Mono 1.1.14 Linux Installer? If not, can it be updated to include it?

Re: [Mono-dev] Gtk# not found

2006-04-07 Thread Wade Berrier
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 00:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was good to know that it was a bug, as a first thing, because i actually ended up suspecting that it might have not been a bug. And it is good to know that you are still paying attention to it. And even better to know that you may

Re: [Mono-dev] Gtk# not found

2006-04-07 Thread Wade Berrier
I've updated the Windows installer (1.1.14) to contain a new gtk# that includes the gtk# policy.config files. Find it here: http://www.mono-project.com/Downloads Wade On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:04 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 00:06 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Mono-dev] Is anyone using mono develop in 1.1.13.2?

2006-03-01 Thread Wade Berrier
Could you run monodevelop with increased logging? Do this with the following from a terminal window: export MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug monodevelop That could help shed some light on this. If you have gtk+2.4 installed (which it appears you do), I'm not sure what the problem could be, other than

Re: [Mono-dev] Is anyone using mono develop in 1.1.13.2?

2006-03-01 Thread Wade Berrier
environment? j- k- On Wednesday 01 March 2006 14:00, Wade Berrier wrote: Could you run monodevelop with increased logging? Do this with the following from a terminal window: export MONO_LOG_LEVEL=debug monodevelop That could help shed some light on this. If you have gtk+2.4

Re: [Mono-dev] Re: [Mono-patches] r55877 - trunk/mono-tools

2006-02-09 Thread Wade Berrier
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 09:18 -0600, Mike Kestner wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 21:49 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: Currently the monodoc browser is available on many older distros as well as win32. But with this change it won't work on older distros nor win32. It looks like sles9, rh9

[Mono-dev] Getting Ready for 1.1.13 Release

2006-01-03 Thread Wade Berrier
Hey all, We're getting ready for the 1.1.13 release. Tarballs will be created Thursday evening MST. This will probably be our last drop into the upcoming SuSE products. Wade signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [Mono-dev] How to get mdb to work as installed with the Mono 1.1.12 Linux installer

2005-12-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi Hans, Thanks for the great feedback and solution. The debugger needs some slight changes in order to work in a relocated environment. I went ahead and filed a bug: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=77062 Wade On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 18:42 +0100, Hans Kratz wrote: Hi! I tried

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono daily packages missing

2005-12-01 Thread Wade Berrier
The daily downloads are now updated and will happen at 1 am EST. Also, the bug where mono-latest.tar.gz pointing to the wrong file has been fixed. (It previously pointed to 1.1.9 downloads instead of 1.1.10). Wade On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 10:44 -0500, Miguel Icaza wrote: Hello, there

[Mono-dev] libgdiplus gcc4 cairo patch

2005-11-21 Thread Wade Berrier
Hey, I noticed this in SuSE autobuild... looks like gcc4 was updated in SuSE's build system and now this patch is required to build libgdiplus. Wade --- cairo/pixman/src/pixman-remap.h 2005-08-29 20:11:27.0 +0200 +++ cairo/pixman/src/pixman-remap.h 2005-11-21 18:36:11.200147358 +0100 @@

[Mono-dev] Installers and relative paths

2005-10-24 Thread Wade Berrier
The latest Windows installer doesn't set any environment variables in the wrapper scripts and batch files (MONO_PATH, etc...). This works fine in finding the gac binaries. I've looked into doing this for the linux installer as well, and some programs didn't work. gmcs worked, but mcs didn't

Re: [Mono-dev] What about the Windows setup of Mono?

2005-10-17 Thread Wade Berrier
allowing the Mono Win32 installers to allow parallel installs. I need the ability to have multiple versions of mono installed. Some application working in one version, such as, Mono 1.1.6 do not work in Mono 1.1.8. Wade Berrier wrote: Hi Kornél, I'm working

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-10-04 Thread Wade Berrier
it probably turns out that System.XML is the first dll that gets compiled from the mini wrapper? I wonder what could be causing this? Wade On 10/4/05, Raja R Harinath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [snip] So, now when I build, the .dll files

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-10-04 Thread Wade Berrier
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 18:36 +0200, Kornél Pál wrote: From: Wade Berrier So it probably turns out that System.XML is the first dll that gets compiled from the mini wrapper? Yes, it is, but this was mentioned by Zoltán in the message you replyed to: From: Zoltan Varga The line which

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

2005-10-03 Thread Wade Berrier
Message - From: Zoltan Varga [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Francisco Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-10-03 Thread Wade Berrier
Hey, On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 02:23 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote: This works fine on my system using latest cygwin. My libint is in /lib/libintl.a. Perhaps you don't have that package installed, or libintl-1.dll is in a directory in your PATH so libtool finds it first ? This same error happens

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-10-03 Thread Wade Berrier
automake bison cpio gcc-mingw-core gcc-mingw-g++ make openssh unzip zip wget cvs cygrunsrv patch subversion vim wget And of course other packages get selected by dependency. Am I missing something obvious? Wade On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:19 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: Hey, On Sat, 2005-10-01

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-10-03 Thread Wade Berrier
/PatternParser.cs Mono.Xml.Xsl/PatternTokenizer.cs | tr '/' ''` @../../build/deps/basic_System.Xml.dll.response That's about all I've been able to figure out. Wade On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 18:07 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: One more note, looks like monodis.exe, mono.exe, and monograph.exe were not statically

[Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

2005-09-30 Thread Wade Berrier
Get 'em while it's hot: http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.1.9.1_1/windows/mono-1.1.9.1-gtksharp-1.0.10-2.3.91-win32-0.exe Thanks for the suggestions and input. There are improvements to be made, but this should do for now. Let me know of any installer issues. Thanks Paco, you rock :) Wade

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

2005-09-30 Thread Wade Berrier
decided not to include gdiplus.dll? I'm still waiting for Miguel to approve it. He wasn't sure if we should or not. Wade Kornél - Original Message - From: Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Cc: Francisco Martinez [EMAIL

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

2005-09-30 Thread Wade Berrier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kornél Pál [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Francisco Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:33 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released It uses relative paths, so its

[Fwd: Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released]

2005-09-30 Thread Wade Berrier
---BeginMessage--- - also, as Kornel said, the runtime should not be statically linked, but instead it should be dynamically linked against a mono-1.dll file. This should be the default in our build process, so I don't know why this isn't happening. What configure arguments are you using

Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 1.1.9.1 Windows Installer Released

2005-09-30 Thread Wade Berrier
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 07:03 -0500, Francisco Martinez wrote: Wade it shows all the hard work you have put into this. Good job! Since some of the exe(s) are now in a different location, I will have to adjust the tools like MonoLaunch and the Visual Studio .NET add-in (vsprj2make).

Re: [Mono-dev] What about the Windows setup of Mono?

2005-09-28 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi Kornél, I'm working on the windows installer and it should be finished shortly. I'm shooting for today but it may be tomorrow. The good news is that after I'm done automating it the installers will be released in parallel with the mono releases. Your suggestions are very much appreciated.

Re: [Mono-dev] What about the Windows setup of Mono?

2005-09-28 Thread Wade Berrier
.:) May I have a look at the setup script before you build the installer? Kornél - Original Message - From: Wade Berrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:47 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] What about the Windows setup of Mono

Re: re[2]: [Mono-devel-list] Re: mono 1.1.8.2 problems with mdb

2005-07-15 Thread Wade Berrier
The solution for SuSE 9.3 ended up being to install the compat-readline4 package. I may end up adding the readline binaries to the installer so that it doesn't matter if you have the readline4 binaries installed or not. Wade On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:35 +0100, Mike Horsley wrote: Gary no.

Re: [Mono-devel-list] mono 1.1.8.2 problems with mdb

2005-07-07 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi Mike, It almost sounds like the default mono that came with suse 9.3 is being used to run mdb without setting up the environment vars to find the libs included with the installer. The installer puts some settings in $HOME/.bashrc that need to be loaded. You can do this by starting a new

RE: [Mono-devel-list] mono 1.1.8 - monodebug - what do i need to do tomake it run?

2005-07-05 Thread Wade Berrier
RPMs for mono-debugger have been posted to www.go-mono.com and are available in the OpenCarpet and yum channels. Wade On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:02 -0600, Wade Berrier wrote: Currently, the only way to get mono-debugger working correctly is compiling it from source. We're still working on some

RE: [Mono-devel-list] mono 1.1.8 - monodebug - what do i need to do tomake it run?

2005-07-01 Thread Wade Berrier
Currently, the only way to get mono-debugger working correctly is compiling it from source. We're still working on some prebuilt packages, and we will announce when they are ready. Wade P.S. The debugger was accidentally included in the 1.1.8.1 linux installer, but it does not work. On Thu,